• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Aircraft Hangers (IBC Section 412.3.1)

3F Inspections

REGISTERED
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
33
Location
Lone Oak, TX, United States
I have a couple of aircraft hangers being proposed 20 feet apart at a municipal airport with no lot lines between they are 7500 sq. ft. each and I believe the section 412.3.1 applies requiring a 30 feet separation of 2-hour fire resistance rating. Opinions/thoughts from my fellow code officials?

412.3.1 Exterior walls. Exterior walls located less than
30 feet (9144 mm) from lot lines or a public way shall
have a fire-resistance rating not less than 2 hours.

2021 IBC no amendment.
 
The requirement specifically states "lot lines," which is a defined term. Since there is no lot line between the two hangars, only the requirements for buildings on the same lot per Section 705.3 would apply, which allows either the two hangars be considered as portions of a single building (if allowable area permits it) or as separate buildings with an imaginary line between them and the fire ratings of and openings within the exterior walls are subject to fire separation distances per Section 705.5.
 
I have a couple of aircraft hangers being proposed 20 feet apart at a municipal airport with no lot lines between they are 7500 sq. ft. each and I believe the section 412.3.1 applies requiring a 30 feet separation of 2-hour fire resistance rating. Opinions/thoughts from my fellow code officials?

412.3.1 Exterior walls. Exterior walls located less than
30 feet (9144 mm) from lot lines or a public way shall
have a fire-resistance rating not less than 2 hours.

2021 IBC no amendment.
Doesn’t NFPA 409 apply in the specific jurisdiction?
In older editions of 409, there used to be a building cluster definition which provided some flexibility….
 
The requirement specifically states "lot lines," which is a defined term. Since there is no lot line between the two hangars, only the requirements for buildings on the same lot per Section 705.3 would apply, which allows either the two hangars be considered as portions of a single building (if allowable area permits it) or as separate buildings with an imaginary line between them and the fire ratings of and openings within the exterior walls are subject to fire separation distances per Section 705.5.
I am not sure that I agree that this is the controlling code section and in reading the code commentary see below the exception you refer to only exempts from the provisions of 705.5 and 705.8 not the special requirement of chapter 4. The requirements of 412.3.1 are "SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS" and specific to aircraft related occupancies.

Exception 1 permits two buildings on the same lot
to be exempt from Sections 705.5 and 705.8 when
considered as one building in accordance with Section
503.1.2.
 
I am not sure that I agree that this is the controlling code section and in reading the code commentary see below the exception you refer to only exempts from the provisions of 705.5 and 705.8 not the special requirement of chapter 4. The requirements of 412.3.1 are "SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS" and specific to aircraft related occupancies.

Exception 1 permits two buildings on the same lot
to be exempt from Sections 705.5 and 705.8 when
considered as one building in accordance with Section
503.1.2.
Section 412.3.1 does include "Special Detailed Requirements" for hangars, but that does not mean you ignore the rest of the building code.

Section 705.3, Exception 1, is permitted since nothing in Section 412.3 prohibits its use, and Exception 1 does not exclude hangars. How are two hangars separated by 30 feet any more hazardous than two bays within the same hangar building? I would argue that two hangar bays, each in a separate building with a 30-foot distance between them, are less hazardous. If the total building area of the two buildings complies with the allowable area requirements for the most restrictive construction type and they meet all other requirements for hangars, then I see no reason why Exception 1 cannot be used.

Further, the use of "lot lines" (italicized) in Section 412.3.1 is limited to the definition of a lot line--not imaginary lines between buildings on the same lot. The imaginary lines permitted for Sections 705.5 and 705.8 are not lot lines. Additionally, Section 412.3.1 does not use the term fire separation distance, which would allow measurement to an imaginary line; it only states a specific minimum distance to lot lines and public ways.

This raises another interesting conundrum: At what point do you measure the distance to a public way?

Per the definition of fire separation distance (FSD), it is measured to the centerline; however, FSD is not used in Section 412.3.1. Thus, I would interpret this to mean the bounding edge of the public way, which could be the lot line at the edge of a road or street right-of-way, or the edge of an easement that qualifies as a public way.
 
Our municipal airport owns all of the underlying land. Every lease agreement includes a description of the size of the lot an individual may construct a hanger on. A "lot" by definition and the "lot line" do not have to be a survey or recorded legal description for building code purposes.
Do you have a lease agreement that includes a lot description or an airport master plan with detailed lots that can be used?

[A]LOT. A portion or parcel of land considered as a unit.
[A]LOT LINE. A line dividing one lot from another, or from a street or any public place.
 
Back
Top