Francis Vineyard
REGISTERED
NFPA JOURNAL, July/August 2010, page 54, Reference; NFPA 72, “Sound Advice”
“These changes are a result of research sponsored by the Fire Protection Research Foundation on the effectiveness of alarms for emergency notification of high-risk groups, including those with hearing loss and those who are under the influence of alcohol. The findings suggest that a low-frequency output may be more effective in waking these individuals than the widely used high-frequency alarm signal, or even high-intensity strobe lights.”
I’m curious does any one have a clue how this research was performed on those under the influence of alcohol or was a presumption made between the two groups?
“These changes are a result of research sponsored by the Fire Protection Research Foundation on the effectiveness of alarms for emergency notification of high-risk groups, including those with hearing loss and those who are under the influence of alcohol. The findings suggest that a low-frequency output may be more effective in waking these individuals than the widely used high-frequency alarm signal, or even high-intensity strobe lights.”
I’m curious does any one have a clue how this research was performed on those under the influence of alcohol or was a presumption made between the two groups?