I think what scares me most is imagining what that serves. My mind is filling in the rest of the picture, it isn't pretty.
-
Welcome to The Building Code Forum
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
An average day
- Thread starter ICE
- Start date
Yikes
SAWHORSE
This is where my mind goes:
Should have used TR outlets, right?
Someone told me a long time ago that water and electricity doesn't mix?
They may have proved that wrong?
In the 1960's my father had a project which utilized copper conductors that were pipe. Water flowed through the pipe to prevent it from melting.
Grok said:
"Pure H₂O, in its ideal form, does not conduct electricity effectively because it contains no free ions or charged particles to carry an electric current. Water molecules are neutral, with a covalent bond between hydrogen and oxygen, and pure water has a very low concentration of ions due to minimal self-ionization (H₂O ⇌ H₃O⁺ + OH⁻). This self-ionization produces an extremely small number of ions (about 10⁻⁷ M at 25°C), resulting in very high electrical resistance.However, in practice, even "pure" water may contain trace impurities, dissolved gases (like CO₂, which can form carbonic acid), or ions from containers, which can slightly increase conductivity. For significant conduction, water typically needs dissolved electrolytes, like salts, to provide free ions.So, theoretically, pure H₂O is a poor conductor, but real-world "pure" water may conduct slightly due to impurities or self-ionization."
Where' the bonding?