It's not a code violation if the door swings out but security hinges are a good idea.


Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Do you amend your code? I didn't think a door could swing over a step.ICE said:It's not a code violation if the door swings out but security hinges are a good idea.![]()
![]()
The next time you encounter a Little Giant ladder, set it up like this and try to climb it. The lower roof ladder shall be set up and tied or someone there to hold it because gutter is slippery and easily damaged.TheCommish said:Be thankfull, this time the ladders extends 3 rungs above the roof
It's not that hard to do. Think screen door. Do you see a step? I don't see a step. Is there a step? Watch out for the step!High Desert said:I didn't think a door could swing over a step.
R311.4.3 Landings at doors.High Desert said:It's not a screen door though.
that threshold is going to work out real good!ICE said:It's not a code violation if the door swings out but security hinges are a good idea.![]()
![]()
"that threshold is going to work out real good!" Don't unnerstand yer thinkin.pwood said:that threshold is going to work out real good!
I got in today and there is no CO detector. This is the second time that I have encountered the declaration in lieu of an inspection and detectors were missing both times.ICE said:This was on the wall next to the job card on a re-roof final inspection. It is a self declaration that there are smoke detectors installed per the code. I am being asked to accept this in lieu of seeing the detectors because it's a hassle for the owner to arrange an inspection.![]()