Yankee
Registered User
FyrBldhGuy, I feel your pain, believe me I do.
"I" has the possibility of indicating that personal freedoms of the occupants can be removed judged by a BO's interpretation of "inability".peach said:Proper classification of any assisted living facility (I, R... aeiou).. is the toughest part of this job. So many variables (even in the I codes).. throw in state or local requirements, it's as clear as mud. It's tough because it depends on the rose colored glasses of the plan reviewer and the information provided by the applicant. I is always safer, because it allows for change, and generally provides more stringent standards upfront.
Probably true, but that is an interpretation based on what might happen in the future. If the applicant wants residential, I don't believe that interpretation is defensible.peach said:There's more flexibility building to I in the first place.