• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

AutoCAD Alternatives

Yankee Chronicler

REGISTERED
Joined
Oct 17, 2023
Messages
3,327
Location
New England
I perhaps could have posted this under Building Code Administration, but it's not a perfect fir there so I decided to post it here. If your department accepts digital construction documents, more than likely the usual format will be PDF -- as it should be.Nonetheless, the general public is endlessly inventive in its collective efforts to frustrate the poor, over-burdened code officials. We've seen a recent "uptick" (how I hate that word) in digital submissions consisting of a plan sketched free-hand on a sheet of lined paper torn out of a notebook and scanned or photographed to .JPG or .PNG format with a cell phone and then sent to someone in the department (usually the first name they could find an e-mail address for) using the "Share" function from the cell phone's photo gallery.

And, once in a while, we'll get a drawing from somebody who must have gotten a student copy of AutoCAD when they were in college 20 years ago and they fired it up to draw plans for their new deck or family room addition. So you get this file in AutoCAD .dwg format (because God forbid our intrepid hero should know how to export or plot to PDF) -- what can you do if you can't or don't want to just reject it outright?

Option 1 is that Autodesk, the company that sells (sorry -- rents) AutoCAD and Revit publishes a FREE utility that allows you to open AutoCAD files and view them, but not make any editorial changes. It also allows converting new .dwg files to be compatible with older versions of AutoCAD. It's called DWG TrueView and it's entirely free. It only runs under windows, but most municipal and county computer systems are probably locked into Microsoft anyway, so for most of us that's not an issue.

Option 2 is to actually install a program that can open and edit AutoCAD .dwg files. There are a number of commercial programs that can do that, all of them cheaper than AutoCAD itself. Surprisingly, some of these companies offer versions that are entirely free. I've looked at as many of them as I could get my grubby hands on, and I've found a couple that might be handy to have on at least one computer in your department (if you can convince your IT department to install it). One caution, though, is that the free versions don't open .dwg files created by the newest versions of AutoCAD, so you'll also need the DWG TrueView utility discussed above to convert files to an older version of the .dwg format.

The two I suggest looking at if you want to go this route are NanoCAD Free and DoubleCAD XT. Both are essentially older versions of commercial CADD software that the manufacturers/publishers make available for free in the hope that users will like the software well enough to upgrade to the newest paid version. Both of them look and work enough like AutoCAD that anyone who has learned on AutoCAD should be able to start using them with virtually no learning curve.

DoubleCAD XT is put out by TurboCAD, which is a company that publishes the commercial program TurboCAD, a serious contended in CADD software for architecture and building engineering, as well as several programs aimed squarely at do-it-yourselfers and home designers looking for CADD solutions for generating house plans that more or less automate the creation of construction documents from schematic designs.

Despite this pedigree, I found a couple of quirks with DoubleCAD XT that are different enough from AutoCAD that I had trouble adapting to using it. I prefer NanoCAD Free. It's so similar to AutoCAD that there's virtually no learning curve at all for people who have learned on AutoCAD. Our town IT department was willing to install NanoCAD on my computer and the boss's computer in our department. We don't use it often, but it's nice to have. And it was very handy a couple of years ago when the boss decided to rearrange the office, because we were able to draw up the plan in CADD and see what would fit where, without starting to actually push furniture and cubicles around.
 
A third option is to have them send you an older .dxf file which there are more than a few programs that will allow you to open older .dxf cad files and save it right to pdf, not the .dxf or .dwg.

Bluebeam Revue Core or higher is one.

I tell plan reviewers and code officials, never accept a format that your department can alter by accident that is non-traceable or auditable.
 
A third option is to have them send you an older .dxf file which there are more than a few programs that will allow you to open older .dxf cad files and save it right to pdf, not the .dxf or .dwg.

Bluebeam Revue Core or higher is one.

I tell plan reviewers and code officials, never accept a format that your department can alter by accident that is non-traceable or auditable.
All drawings for us are required to be in PDF and digitally signed and sealed by the design professional of record using a qualified third-party app such as GlobalSign, IdenTrust, or other verification system.
 
All drawings for us are required to be in PDF and digitally signed and sealed by the design professional of record using a qualified third-party app such as GlobalSign, IdenTrust, or other verification system.

Our state laws have required either "wet" seals and signatures or third-party authenticated digital signatures and seals for architects and for professional engineers since around 1990 -- since before most of the architects we deal with had even gotten their licenses. Even so, it's the exception rather than the rule if we receive digital construction documents with a proper digital signature, and we always get push-back when we cite the law and inform them that the state building inspector has told us we have to enforce that law.
 
ProgeCad is a very inexpensive option that I use and is dwg compatible back and forth

ProgeCAD looks and feels almost identical to AutoCAD. They used to offer a free version, but now it's limited to a 30-day trial. It is a lot less expensive than AutoCAD, but at $469 for a single user plus $161 for additional users on a network, it's not something that building departments with tight budgets will easily be able to implement, and wouldn't be worthwhile if the need is random and sporadic. But, it's there.

In fact, for just being able to open and view AutoCAD files, the free Autodesk reviewer is all most departments need.
 
Great post, YC, and great discussion all around.

For me, personally, I have BricsCAD and CADDirect (which includes Print2CAD for turning PDF's into DWG files) though both are paid and not free.

I think the real question is (at least for a Building Department), why would you need to open up a DWG file that has been submitted? The minute you open it, the question could then come up of "What did YOU change in the file?" If it's all internal (ie. space planning for your department) it's no different than any of us on the other side of the counter using it to explore and create useable DWG files; if it's to dink around in a DWG file submitted "over the counter" it's best to use the ACAD free reviewer.
 
I have never needed to play with .dwg files on my work computer, but then I also don't review plans very often. I have used CAD software to draw pictures to help communicate with contractors, and I have used it to draw details for handouts addressing frequently asked questions and common violations. The ADA illustration I drew up and widely distribute has been particularly useful, as the ADA pages on the plans we get are usually technically correct but written in ways that makes the contractors likely to screw it up.

I learned on AutoCAD in school and my dad had an early 2000s version of AutoCAD (from back when you could one-time purchase AutoCAD and have it on a disk) that we used for projects. I have found that the free version of SketchUp is just fine for drawing illustrations in 3D, and then I use screenshots to get the drawings into a more universal format (Word or pdf). It works pretty well, actually, especially for making drawings that are easy to interpret by non-builders, but I have missed AutoCAD for sure. I'm definitely looking into some of these mentioned that look and feel like AutoCAD.
 
I think the real question is (at least for a Building Department), why would you need to open up a DWG file that has been submitted? The minute you open it, the question could then come up of "What did YOU change in the file?" If it's all internal (ie. space planning for your department) it's no different than any of us on the other side of the counter using it to explore and create useable DWG files; if it's to dink around in a DWG file submitted "over the counter" it's best to use the ACAD free reviewer.

We receive a lot of support documents in Word .docx format rather than PDF, and it drives me bonkers. BUT ... the arbiter of what's acceptable as a public record in this state is the State Library, and they say that Word and Excel files are acceptable, so we have to accept them. I don't think they have ruled on AutoCAD .dwg files, but the town administration would have a cow if I denied a permit because the plans were in .dwg rather than .pdf. Fortunately, that has only happened twice if the four years I've been in this job.
 
We receive a lot of support documents in Word .docx format rather than PDF, and it drives me bonkers. BUT ... the arbiter of what's acceptable as a public record in this state is the State Library, and they say that Word and Excel files are acceptable, so we have to accept them. I don't think they have ruled on AutoCAD .dwg files, but the town administration would have a cow if I denied a permit because the plans were in .dwg rather than .pdf. Fortunately, that has only happened twice if the four years I've been in this job.
I send all of my plan reviews out in Word...That way anyone can insert their answers right into the document...
 
I send all of my plan reviews out in Word...That way anyone can insert their answers right into the document...

I send mine out as PDF/A (the 'A' indicates "Archival" -- any attempt at editing removes the 'A' flag, indicating tampering). I've been burning too many times by people altering documents. They can copy and paste from a PDF ...
 
Back
Top