• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Best-looking DCDA?

Yikes

SAWHORSE
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
4,047
Location
Southern California
I hate that detector check assemblies (a) mostly look like kludge, and (b) have to be located close to the building entrance, and thus are prominently displayed kludge.

Is there any manufacturer that has taken a run at making a more elegantly styled DCDA? What's the best-looking one you've seen?

Steampunk has its place in pop culture, but I prefer it not to be in front of my buildings.
 
@ ~ @


From one manufacturer of these devices ( Watts ):

Below Ground Installations
The Series 007DCDA is not recommend for below ground (burial)
installations........The most satisfactory installation is above
ground and should be installed in this manner whenever possible.
If below ground installation is required, the use of a “valve box”
to shield the Backflow Assembly from contact with soil organics
and provide adequate drainage in the event of rain-fall is
recommended........Consult your Local Governing Code for
proper below ground installation and agency code requirements.


This is one type of insulated, "above ground" cover:


This link shows some examples of other types:
http://backflow-supply.com/content/enclosures


@ ~ @
 
On fire sprinklers systems , we started putting them inside the building

Owner responsible for tests and repairs
 
Back
Top