fatboy
Administrator
Fine and dandy law..............better ask your Counsel before you walk into a structure/property where you are not invited, without a court order in hand. Me thinks they wouldn't be so happy with you.
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Mark's post said:may enter and inspect
public and private properties to secure compliance with the
rules and regulations promulgated by the Department of
Housing and Community Development.
As an Inspector, you can't just "walk in", someone has to invite you in.
That's not outrageous, probably only $100,000 of that is salary the rest benefits, in California he's paying anywhere from 35 to 55% in income taxes unless he's got a lot of writeoffs, rents are anywhere from $2,000 to $3,000 a month, doesn't leave much left over for beer money.Don't let someone know this::
Records indicate Schimm earned $123,000.00 in 2015 including pay and benefits.
$ 60 an hour
East Bay Times said:Repeated requests Monday for routine city records showing when the building was last inspected for fire safety were denied. Records normally provided over the counter that would show details about code enforcement visits were also not released Monday despite repeated requests. A Bay Area News Group lawyer objected in a letter to the city about the lack of access.
Oakland officials were mum on the matter Monday. Mayor Libby Schaaf walked away from a reporter trying to interview her about the visits and how often the fire department inspected the building. In a statement issued Monday night, Schaaf said “initial information (is being) compiled and (we) will be reviewing it with the District Attorney prior to release.” DA Nancy O’Malley is conducting a criminal investigation of the fire.
The city’s fire department boasts on its website of “an excellent program” in which firefighters do surprise “field inspections, on a block-by-block basis. Inspections occur at least one time annually. In some instances, high-hazard (buildings) may require additional inspections.”
Warehouse owner Chor Ng was well known to the city Code Enforcement office.
She faced $15,000 in code enforcement fines attached to her 2013-2014 county tax bill and $7,600 in similar costs in 2009 for the property. In 2007, a notice of a substandard building and special assessment of $15,000 was filed against her.
Records also show city taxes on the property were often not paid. Ng could not be reached for comment. A lawyer who has represented her in real estate matters did not return messages.
Last month an unidentified code enforcement officer went to the building in response to complaints about piles of garbage. No one came to the door of the collective. The next day, the city started an investigation about apparent illegal structures being built inside the warehouse. But no inspectors returned to follow up before the fire.
It was far from the only chance for someone to notice the hazardous conditions.
• In March of last year, police responded to a report of a dance party at the warehouse where attendees were paying $25 a head to get in. An officer was reportedly denied entry by a doorman claiming that the location was a private club with members paying monthly dues, records show. The officer left because there was no evidence of a crime.
• A tenant dispute in February 2014 also drew the attention of police. Almena was reportedly cited for battery, and another man was arrested, but no charges came out of the encounter. Officers didn’t enter the building.
• On Jan. 13, 2015, Almena was arrested on suspicion on possession of stolen property at the warehouse. According an Alameda County Sheriff’s Office probable-cause document, a woman named Farrah Dalal flagged down a passing Alameda sheriff’s deputy and said Almena had stolen her trailer and she had tracked it to the 31st Avenue site.
Dalal, who claimed Almena was her former tenant, had performed a citizen’s arrest of Almena, and Deputy Jeremy Lucha arrested him and booked him into a county jail. In his report, Lucha stated that Almena confessed to having the trailer “for about a week.” It was unclear from the report if Lucha entered the warehouse or arrested Alemna in the vacant lot next to it.
Almena spent two days in jail and agreed to plead no contest to a lesser misdemeanor charge of possessing stolen property. He was sentenced to three years’ probation and was ordered to pay restitution.
• In February 2015, the Alameda County Child and Family Services Department was called to the warehouse and took custody of Almena’s three children out of safety concerns about them living there, according to a court document. Almena also later posted on Facebook that it had happened but blamed a tenant for “fake accusations.” The children were later returned to Almena and his wife. The department director didn’t return a message Monday.¹
Well doggone, are you telling me that I have been breaking the rules?
Probably......
That's what both the owner and lessor of the Ghost Ship said.Not breaking the rules, if the court don't catch you
East Bay Times said:District Attorney Nancy O’Malley’s criminal investigation is a first step toward accountability. The probe should include the owner of the property, the mastermind tenant who created Ghost Ship, the concert organizers and promoters, the city inspectors who had been warned, and the elected leaders who knew but didn’t speak out.
Some should go to jail. Some should lose their jobs. Some will face civil liability, for whatever cold comfort it can bring survivors.
Even the artists who lived there bear responsibility. They describe horrific electrical hookups and other fires-in-waiting. Yes, reporting those conditions likely would have cost them their homes, but it might have prevented the city’s deadliest fire.
Property owners gripe about building codes and permit costs. Maybe some are excessive. But the Ghost Ship is precisely the worst nightmare that building standards and concert venue requirements are supposed to prevent. The rules are the reason we have fewer massive casualty fires than a century ago.¹
East Bay Times said:Because it’s so expensive to secure building permits in the city, a lot of the warehouses aren’t even certified for occupancy. Master tenants representing groups of people negotiate with landlords who rent out the dwellings illegally.
“Five hundred dollars a month right now is a golden ticket to have a place to cook and shower and sleep; it doesn’t matter what it is as long as you can make your art and be part of a community,” Strauss said. “But we’re being forced into the worst places because of the economic, political and social climate in the city.”²
That's what both the owner and lessor of the Ghost Ship said.