• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

CA code for apartment complex gym and pool

msoblessed

GREENHORN
Joined
May 31, 2024
Messages
3
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Hello, I am inquiring in California has a code for a public restroom at an apartment complex for a gym and restroom? We had a restroom before pandemic but since then we have no access to a restroom for the amenities at our complex.
 
Can you explain the situation a bit more? You say that the restrooms are public. Is the gym public (anyone can use them), or is it only for the residence and their guests? What is the reason the restroom is no longer accessible?
 
I would hazard a guess that when the building was designed, they provided the required number of bathrooms per CPC Table 422.1. During the pandemic many places closed "public" bathrooms citing health concerns.

Now those places are facing the fact that yes, they are required and yes, you do need to start maintaining them again.
 
My apologies, the gym and pool are private and only for residence an guests. We had a club house where we could use the amenities, tv, kitchen, two living room areas with tables to play games or gather.
Yes, you are correct, they did close during pandemic.

The pool an gym opened but not the restrooms that are in that area. The club house and other areas never opened up and we pay a lot for those extra amenities.

Yes, I do believe they should be opened up again. I had inquired but they said they did not have clearance. Then they opened for a short while about a year ago but never opened back up again.
 
I’m not an expert on this topic, but the requirement for toilets at a pool does exist in the California Building Code -

This chapter applies to HCD 2 (mobile home parks) and DSA-AC / DPH (public pools). I don't believe that chapter is applicable in this situation.
 
...the required number of bathrooms per CPC Table 422.1.
California Plumbing Code Table 422.1 lists the required number of fixtures per occupancy type. This is not per occupancy group, and this is a very important distinction. An R-2 occupancy building may include "public" areas. This doesn't mean "open to the public", this just means that anybody who has legitimate access to the building may use these spaces. Much like a pool in a hotel that does not open to the public, they're still considered public spaces.

Any pool or gym (or combined) in an apartment building built under some version of the uniform plumbing code will require at least two restrooms. Most likely they will be gender specific and accessible.
 
I do not know what the code said at time your project was first constructed, and you haven't stated the project location in order to determine applicable code. But for sake of discussion, let's assume the current 2022 LA Building Code Chapter 31B, which is adopted by the California Dept. of Public Health, applies to your project. It's probably also safe to assume that if it is a statewide health code requirement, it may apply to other jurisdictions unless those jurisdictions adopted a different or more stringent code.

2022 LABC Chapter 31B states the following regard (a) showers, (b) dressing facilities, and (c) toilet facilities.

Chapter 31B [DPH] Public Pools

Section 3116B Dressing, Shower and Toilet Facilities

Shower and dressing facilities shall be provided for users of a pool.​
Exceptions:
1. Shower and dressing facilities may not be required when pool users have access to such facilities in adjacent living quarters.​
2. Public toilet facilities may be omitted when pool users have access to toilet facilities either in living quarters located not more than 300 feet (91,440 mm) in travel distance from the pool or in an adjacent building such as a recreational facility, club-house or cabana.​

3116B.2 Number of Sanitary Facilities​
For the purpose of this subsection, one pool user shall be considered for every 15 square feet (1.39 m2) of pool water surface area and/or spray ground splash zone area.​
3116B.2.1 Showers​
One shower shall be provided for every 50 pool users.​
3116B.2.2 Toilets​
Separate toilet facilities shall be provided for each sex. One toilet shall be provided for every 60 women or less and one toilet plus one urinal for every 75 men or less.​
3116B.2.3 Lavatories​
One lavatory shall be provided for every 80 pool users.​

The code does not have a specific definition of “adjacent” when referring to "adjacent living quarters". So the final requirement may be subjective on a case-by-case interpretive basis for a specific individual development, rather than a "bright line" prescriptive rule.
One more note, is that the apartment unit is not 10-20 residence where you have a short distance to walk. We have 13 buildings and are a distance away.
It is interesting to note that for toilets, 3116.B.1 exc. #2 limits “adjacent” to a 300’ travel distance, but for shower facilities there is no corresponding limit of distance.

From this, you need to determine and propose to the Authority Having Jurisdiction whether the apartments are sufficiently “adjacent” in terms of both spatial relationship and practical distance that the apartment showers and toilets fulfill the scoping requirements of LABC 3116.1.

Reminder, the above info has been provided as a hypothetical example. If your pool was built a long time ago under a different code, then that older code may be applicable instead of the 2022 LABC 31B code I quoted above.
 
Last edited:
Reminder, the above info has been provided as a hypothetical example. If your pool was built a long time ago under a different code, then that older code may be applicable instead of the 2022 LABC 31B code I quoted above.
California has been on some version if the UPC for a long time, I haven't looked back but I would assume some version of table 422.1 existed. But to your point, to answer this definitively, you have to find out when it was built, and what the codes were at that time.
 
California has been on some version if the UPC for a long time, I haven't looked back but I would assume some version of table 422.1 existed. But to your point, to answer this definitively, you have to find out when it was built, and what the codes were at that time.
That said, I think the scoping requirements for pool-related sanitary facilities has for many years originated from the California Department of Public Health, not from the Plumbing Code. I'm guessing it got copied into CBC 31B because too many designers were failing to research DPH regulations.
To this day, the CPC does not have a minimum plumbing facility requirement for pools (though it does have it for assembly spectator seating at natatoriums).



1717448440211.png
 
To this day, the CPC does not have a minimum plumbing facility requirement for pools (though it does have it for assembly spectator seating at natatoriums).
I disagree. Table 422.1 clearly says type of occupancy, not group. Read the description following A-3, it clearly says "gymnasiums (without spectator seating), indoor pools (without spectator seating)".
 
I disagree. Table 422.1 clearly says type of occupancy, not group. Read the description following A-3, it clearly says "gymnasiums (without spectator seating), indoor pools (without spectator seating)".
You are right! I was focused on A-4, and missed the A-3.
 
Back
Top