miguele3
Bronze Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2011
- Messages
- 52
California added the following section regarding fire partitions: "6. Walls separating enclosed tenant spaces in high-rise buildings and ...."
For many years in California we have had our high rise buildings NOT require a 1 hour partition between tenants. There are two concerns: The first is the difficulty of building a 1 hour partitions between tenants can be very difficult because of all the stuff above the ceiling. The second concern is the bigger one. If I interpret this correctly, we will need fire-smoke dampers between tenants for our plenum return air. But I'm wondering about section 1018.1 which allows non-rated corridors if we have a fully automatic sprinkler system. If we don't need the 1 hour corridor for the tenants, do we then run all our plenum air out into the corridor? If so, how is this an improvement to the code?
For many years in California we have had our high rise buildings NOT require a 1 hour partition between tenants. There are two concerns: The first is the difficulty of building a 1 hour partitions between tenants can be very difficult because of all the stuff above the ceiling. The second concern is the bigger one. If I interpret this correctly, we will need fire-smoke dampers between tenants for our plenum return air. But I'm wondering about section 1018.1 which allows non-rated corridors if we have a fully automatic sprinkler system. If we don't need the 1 hour corridor for the tenants, do we then run all our plenum air out into the corridor? If so, how is this an improvement to the code?
Last edited by a moderator: