conarb
Registered User
Governor Brown has signed AB127 banning flame retardants.
¹ Real costs of California's outdated flammability standards - ContraCostaTimes.com
² AB 127 Threatens Energy Efficiency Goals and Bypasses Green Chemistry Program :: Fox&Hounds
This puts the responsibility on the State fire Marshal to determine what to ban, obviously the intumescent coatings on foams, but all foams burn like crazy when exposed to fire, witness the Rhode Island Station fire. The foam industry fears that all foams will be banned:Contra Costa Times said:Emerging scientific studies link persistent toxic flame-retardant chemicals found in most foam insulation to hormone disruption and developmental problems in animals. These chemicals have been found in food, human blood and breast milk around the world.
Adding these unnecessary flame-retardant chemicals not only adds costs to insulation manufacturers that are then passed on to consumers, but they also result in downstream costs to our health and the environment.
Assembly Bill 127 directs the state fire marshal to update our state's flammability standards, allowing the California Building Standards Commission to update building codes so that designers and builders can maintain overall building fire safety and address the concerns of an increasing number of consumers looking for greener, safer materials.
The bill ensures that builders and consumers have a choice in selecting insulation that is both less expensive and equally fire-protective without subjecting occupants, workers, firefighters or communities to the risks of harmful and ineffective chemicals.
We urge the fire marshal and the California Building Standards Commission to act quickly to update these out-of-date standards and help lead the way to safer environments for workers, builders, families, businesses and all communities in California.
We are all in the business of building for a healthier future, and AB127 is a step forward in creating healthy environments in all of our communities for generations to come.¹
This legislation was promulgated and financed by the Green building industry, including the USGBC and the Sierra Club. Now we will have to wait and see what the State fire Marshal does, of course we all know he is in the pocket of the fire industry. BTW, I see that Nevada has a bill following California on this issue.John Ferraro Executive Director said:Set aside the fact that the use of flame retardants in building insulation and these other products saves lives and reduces fire-related injury and property damage. AB 127 could create unintended consequences when it comes to the energy efficiency, cost and reliability of buildings in California.
Foam insulation products like the one my company installs are widely used in homes, offices and public buildings because they are high-quality, cost-effective and energy efficient. If AB 127 becomes law, architects, builders and contractors like me could lose the option of using foam insulation because of ill-advised changes in fire safety standards. Without foam insulation, buildings would become less energy efficient, and would have much heavier roofs, thicker walls, and air gaps that let heat out during the winter and in during the summer.²
¹ Real costs of California's outdated flammability standards - ContraCostaTimes.com
² AB 127 Threatens Energy Efficiency Goals and Bypasses Green Chemistry Program :: Fox&Hounds