Sara J. R.
REGISTERED
I've tried to search the forums with no luck so here is my situation. Help!
I have a tenant space with a single ada restroom and single exit to street.
The gross SF is 1,100.
I need the occupancy to fall at 49, or below since a coffee shop wants to move in - coffee, baked goods, tables/chairs (not fixed) etc. Now, typically this would fall under an A-2 Assembly space, right? ... BUT, if I consider the seating/standing/kitchen/storage/office/mechanical/corridor spaces separately ... I could plan a space layout geting the occupancy to 49. Magic # for exits. Does that seem logical? Here's a hypothetical example, very hypothetical:
Table 1004.1.1
Area Types:
Standing (5/net) = 100sf = 20.
Seating (un-concentrated tables/chairs– 15/net) = 350sf = 23
Kitchen (200/net) = 250sf = 2
*Business/Office (100/gross) = 100sf = 1
*Storage/Mechanical Room (300/gross) = 100sf. = 1
*Corridor/Hallway to bathroom/mech space (unoccupied) = 120sf = xx
*Restrooms = 80sf (if 2 are required) = xx (** or plus 2)
TOTAL Occupants: 47 (* maybe 49)
* The office, storage are calculated using gross square footage but since it's tenant space I’m assuming that this means the gross SF of the accessory space, and not the entire tenant space. That doesn't seem logical. Furthermore, the corridor is considered unoccupied. The restrooms are considered separately as well for the purposes of calculating the assembly occupancy for egress exits. (If not, then add 1-2 persons) Maintain </= 49 TOTAL occupants.
LAST QUESTION - The Big ONE: Can I get away with ONE ADA accessible restroom?!?!
Assuming, the above works. Then according to the building code (I'm in Ohio!! - but most places are similar) If the occupancy is less than 49 persons, the occupancy classification changes to Group B.
Occupancy load under Group B is calculated per table 1004.1.1 at 1 persons per 100 gross SF. That would be an occupancy load of 11 people. Then, per 2902.2 separate facilities shall not be required in tenant spaces with a total occupant load of 15 or less. Therefore we would only be required to provide 1 ADA accessible restroom.
Thoughts?
I have a tenant space with a single ada restroom and single exit to street.
The gross SF is 1,100.
I need the occupancy to fall at 49, or below since a coffee shop wants to move in - coffee, baked goods, tables/chairs (not fixed) etc. Now, typically this would fall under an A-2 Assembly space, right? ... BUT, if I consider the seating/standing/kitchen/storage/office/mechanical/corridor spaces separately ... I could plan a space layout geting the occupancy to 49. Magic # for exits. Does that seem logical? Here's a hypothetical example, very hypothetical:
Table 1004.1.1
Area Types:
Standing (5/net) = 100sf = 20.
Seating (un-concentrated tables/chairs– 15/net) = 350sf = 23
Kitchen (200/net) = 250sf = 2
*Business/Office (100/gross) = 100sf = 1
*Storage/Mechanical Room (300/gross) = 100sf. = 1
*Corridor/Hallway to bathroom/mech space (unoccupied) = 120sf = xx
*Restrooms = 80sf (if 2 are required) = xx (** or plus 2)
TOTAL Occupants: 47 (* maybe 49)
* The office, storage are calculated using gross square footage but since it's tenant space I’m assuming that this means the gross SF of the accessory space, and not the entire tenant space. That doesn't seem logical. Furthermore, the corridor is considered unoccupied. The restrooms are considered separately as well for the purposes of calculating the assembly occupancy for egress exits. (If not, then add 1-2 persons) Maintain </= 49 TOTAL occupants.
LAST QUESTION - The Big ONE: Can I get away with ONE ADA accessible restroom?!?!
Assuming, the above works. Then according to the building code (I'm in Ohio!! - but most places are similar) If the occupancy is less than 49 persons, the occupancy classification changes to Group B.
Occupancy load under Group B is calculated per table 1004.1.1 at 1 persons per 100 gross SF. That would be an occupancy load of 11 people. Then, per 2902.2 separate facilities shall not be required in tenant spaces with a total occupant load of 15 or less. Therefore we would only be required to provide 1 ADA accessible restroom.
Thoughts?