fatboy
Administrator
I have been asked my professional opinion on a proposed cold weather shelter for the homeless, used during the winter. This is in a neighboring jurisdiction.
The proposed occupants are not allowed to go in until 5:00 pm, and must be out by 7:00am. There is no cooking, meals are brought in in warming appliances. They eat, roll out mats, and sleep.
The location that is being proposed, 9,000 sf, was previously classified as an A-2, it was a events center, and is part of a large sprawling building, maybe 200K sq ft. Wedding, parties, quinceanera's, (Latin culture, 15th year female birthdays, 500+ folks), receptions, etc. were the common uses.
Biggest questions, yes, the entire building is fully sprinklered and alarmed.
Yes, there are accessible restrooms, 4 lavs, 3 urinals, three WC's )1 accessible) for the men, and 6 lavs, seven WC's, 1 accessible) for the women. The population is actually going to be primarily male.
So, the closest occupancy in my thinking is R-1, transient. Does not necessarily fit any of the laundry lists by definition, but I think that is what it is.
2012 IBC is in effect, so this is a change of use, and the IEBC states an A-2 to R-1 is an equal hazard in all three categories.
So, give me your thoughts. What should/could the jurisdiction see as a problem for this?
The proposed occupants are not allowed to go in until 5:00 pm, and must be out by 7:00am. There is no cooking, meals are brought in in warming appliances. They eat, roll out mats, and sleep.
The location that is being proposed, 9,000 sf, was previously classified as an A-2, it was a events center, and is part of a large sprawling building, maybe 200K sq ft. Wedding, parties, quinceanera's, (Latin culture, 15th year female birthdays, 500+ folks), receptions, etc. were the common uses.
Biggest questions, yes, the entire building is fully sprinklered and alarmed.
Yes, there are accessible restrooms, 4 lavs, 3 urinals, three WC's )1 accessible) for the men, and 6 lavs, seven WC's, 1 accessible) for the women. The population is actually going to be primarily male.
So, the closest occupancy in my thinking is R-1, transient. Does not necessarily fit any of the laundry lists by definition, but I think that is what it is.
2012 IBC is in effect, so this is a change of use, and the IEBC states an A-2 to R-1 is an equal hazard in all three categories.
So, give me your thoughts. What should/could the jurisdiction see as a problem for this?