jon17picks
REGISTERED
I'm working on desiging an accessory assembly space on the 4th floor of a hotel project. The owners don't anticipate the occupant load exceeding 49, however there is no way to keep it below this with total area dedicated to the space. So we added a 2nd exit door to the space that will feed back to the corridor. This flys as the door is satisfys the remoteness requirement of 1/3 the diagonal of the space and it keeps the dead end corridor within limitations.
Now I'm considering common path of travel. With one exit, we used to just sneak in within 74' to the point in the corridor where you have access to 2 seperate exits. When you consider the new 2nd path through this corridor, it seems impossible to do it in less than 75' unless the corridor extends further into the space....
So my question is, while I would think common path of travel should still start in this same remote corner of the space, the reading of the code seems to indicate that it doesn't because there are 2 exit access doors from this space now? If that's true, does common path of travel actually start once you exit either of these 2 doors and get into the shared corridor? It seems counter intuitive to the intent of limiting common path of travel to 75' since both of these doors feed back to the same cooridor.
Thanks in advance for any insight. See pic below.
link to pic
Now I'm considering common path of travel. With one exit, we used to just sneak in within 74' to the point in the corridor where you have access to 2 seperate exits. When you consider the new 2nd path through this corridor, it seems impossible to do it in less than 75' unless the corridor extends further into the space....
So my question is, while I would think common path of travel should still start in this same remote corner of the space, the reading of the code seems to indicate that it doesn't because there are 2 exit access doors from this space now? If that's true, does common path of travel actually start once you exit either of these 2 doors and get into the shared corridor? It seems counter intuitive to the intent of limiting common path of travel to 75' since both of these doors feed back to the same cooridor.
Thanks in advance for any insight. See pic below.
link to pic