• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Converting an old house into a restaurant

Coder

REGISTERED
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
306
Location
Colorado
Hi all, I have a hispanic couple that is attempting to convert an old small (1200 sq, ft.?) two story house into a mexican restaurant with a food trailer attached to it as their cooking area. I had to issue a stop work order yesterday for a laundry list of reasons. One of the main reasons is no permits have been applied for and no plans have been approved. Now that they are apparently almost done with the renovations, as far as they are concerned they are ready to open. Sorry, no can do. I have told them time and time again (in English and Spanish) that they need to hire a design professional and submit a detailed set of plans, hire a licensed plumber and electrician, get the health inspector to approve, etc. etc. but they just keep winging it. Anyhow, it is a real gem of a project. The reason I am posting is because I need to confirm that my interpretation of the codes are correct. My question to the group is. If they intend to continue using the 2nd floor as a residence and operate a restaurant below, they will have to retrofit the entire building with fire sprinklers right? Thank you for your replies in advance. Sincerely, the one man show here in podunk.
 
Provide separation per IBC 508.4. I recently worked on a project similar to this (existing building, residential second floor, food facility ground floor). A rated ceiling was required. 2-hour in my case since the building wasn't sprinklered.

Edit: unless "substantial remodel" triggers are hit (assuming your state has something similar to CA), I don't think fire sprinklers will be required.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the replies. Still trying to wrap my head around this section of the 2021 IBC.
902.3.8 Group R. An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3 shall be provided throughout all buildings with a Group R fire area.
The change of occupancy classification from an IRC regulated R-3 SFR to an A-2 on the first floor and continued R-3 on the 2nd floor kicks it over to the IBC and therefore this section would be applicable?
 
It appears that Colorado has adopted the IEBC. Did you begin your code research in the IEBC? If not, why not?

I'm not saying the IEBC will resolve your question, but that would appear to be where you (or, more properly, the applicant's design professional) need to begin.
 
Thank you for the replies. Still trying to wrap my head around this section of the 2021 IBC.
902.3.8 Group R. An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3 shall be provided throughout all buildings with a Group R fire area.
The change of occupancy classification from an IRC regulated R-3 SFR to an A-2 on the first floor and continued R-3 on the 2nd floor kicks it over to the IBC and therefore this section would be applicable?
Not necessarily. Grain of salt since my state (California) does things weird, but a change in occupancy doesn't always trigger fire sprinkler requirements. The only time a remodel triggers fire sprinklers in our state is if we hit the "substantial remodel" threshold - altering 50% of the floor area of the existing structure, with some rare exceptions in my experience. Even then, I'm pretty sure that's a unique requirement specific to California.

Even then, I believe you'll want to look at IEBC before IBC.
 
Thank you for the replies. Still trying to wrap my head around this section of the 2021 IBC.
902.3.8 Group R. An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3 shall be provided throughout all buildings with a Group R fire area.
The change of occupancy classification from an IRC regulated R-3 SFR to an A-2 on the first floor and continued R-3 on the 2nd floor kicks it over to the IBC and therefore this section would be applicable?
The R already exists... even though you are going from IRC to IBC, so IMO you don't get "new use" requirements other than A2 or maybe B.... The A2 would not be allowed on the 2nd story in a non-sprinklered VB building, so that is a thing...And the fire separation that will be required for the R being at least one hour and maybe more for separate uses...
 
Back
Top