• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Day care Occupancy Classification

I hear that.
Per the local daycare codes, the occupant load factor is 35 for classrooms.
Thats where my question specifically is- what about the other ancillary spaces, and their associated postings. And I think your correct and thats a great approach

How does the local daycare code override the building code?

Under the IBC and Table 1004.5, whether you use the factor of 1:20 or 1:35 is a matter of the age group of the kids in the room. Using the small number and posting that could limit the owner's flexibility in adapting to the ages of his/her/their clients' kids. You can post a room for 20 occupants and only put 12 people in it, but you can't (legally) post it for 12 and then put 20 people in it.
 
Right, the number 20 would result in a stricter occupant load than what the local/state allows, so being stricter than code shouldn’t present a problem.
That said, I like your idea and would basically be telling the township that we’re posting the maximum occupant load per the building code, and then—if they have jurisdiction—they can impose a lower occupancy limit.
My assumption is that the state or local agencies are providing funding for the daycare, which effectively means they’re saying: “We’ll fund your childcare program, if you comply with our specific requirements.”
In that case, the owner can absolutely use the IBC occupant load calculations to establish the maximum allowed occupancy. However, by doing so, they’re essentially opting out of the program requirements and, in turn, would lose access to the associated funding.

That leads me to the question again of how to treat the common areas in the occupant load calculations. Logically, if I use a consistent count of 35 SF per person across the entire space, the numbers work out uniformly. But if I use 20 SF per person in some rooms, it implies a higher number of occupants overall—some of whom would logically be present in common areas as well (meaning I should then technically account for more occupants utilizing the common areas).

This is where I often get stuck: (general in many projects) Common areas impact the specific room egress (as they definitely can have a combined and higher OL than specific smaller rooms), but they don’t always change the overall occupant load. Yet (in this case) when I include both classroom and common area loads in my calculations, it appears I’m designing for more people than will realistically be present at one time—especially from an egress or plumbing fixture perspective.

(Another time this comes up is when a school has an auditorium- would definitely count that toward the total occupant load, and other assembly areas used only and specifically by the students in the school, where the OL count for those rooms really should not effect the overall egress calculation and plumbing).
 
Are you suggesting that you would calculate office areas at 1:35, even though IBC Table 1004.5 establishes the ratio for offices at 1:150?

Your opening post said this facility will have children from 2 months to 4-1/2 years. Under IBC 305.2, occupancy by children older than 2-1/2 years is classified as E. Occupancy by children under the age of 2-1/2 years is I-4. Table 1004.5 says the occupant load factor for classrooms (Group E) is 1:20, and for day care it's 1:35.
 
Back
Top