permitguy
REGISTERED
You just confirmed they are now using the IBC as their base document, which was my point. Thanks for confirming it in your usual jacka$$ of a way.
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Yeah, I can see how your ignorance regarding why NFPA 101 enters the equation was clearly communicating your depth of knowledge in the area.permitguy said:You just confirmed they are now using the IBC as their base document, which was my point. Thanks for confirming it in your usual jacka$$ of a way.
Yeah, you have put the A and the E in the same building to avoid separation requirements...D can go in there as well for this project.Examiner said:There maybe some Code requirements to avoid Mixed Occupancy Separation
I don't live or work down there. It isn't worth my time to dig into the legislative history of code development in FL, but I was curious and so I asked the question. I got an answer, too. That's how you learn, which I shouldn't have to explain, but am glad to do since you tend to be a little slow . . .Yeah, I can see how your ignorance regarding why NFPA 101 enters the equation was clearly communicating your depth of knowledge in the area.