• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Design-build / deferred approval

Yikes

SAWHORSE
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
4,104
Location
Southern California
As an architect, I have an increasing number of clients with relatively simple projects that want me to design the building, but have their own design-build contractors to do the mechanical, plumbing and electrical design as a deferred approval. I'm fine with this, but I have some building departments that say it is impossible to defer these approvals, especially where code-required energy calculations (such as California Title 24) relate the efficiency of the mechanical systems to the building envelope.

Does your jurisdiction allow MEP design to be a deferred approval? If so, great! How do you go about proving energy compliance with an architectural (life-safety only) plan check?
 
We require the "shell" to meet a prescriptive minimum and then each element must meet a prescriptive minimum. Or if they want to use Comcheck and plug in the "shell" energy package we try to make that work. Usually end up with a better overall energy package than if they would have used Comcheck from the start.
 
A performance code requires that the building as a whole, everything submitted and approved prior to any permits

If they use the prescriptive I will allow each feature to be independently compliant, per prescription, no trade-offs. long term, perscriptive, will cost the end user more.
 
Back
Top