• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

disconnect ahead of meter cabinet

codeworks

REGISTERED
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
579
Location
South Texas
heres a doosie. we are going to logger heads with our poco because they are saying they want disconnects to be installled ahead of the meter cabinet to "keep thier guys safe" i've never heard of it. if they really want it, thats fine, but then they own it and should supply it disco) and install it( it's in their supply loop) we will still need one on the other side (load side of the meter ) for disconnect of services after the meter. any input, any one heard of this, seen it before ? i can't understand why if the poco is worried about guys pulling meters, they should pull the cutout on the pole
 
Thought they owned everything before the meter??

This is the electric company right?
 
yes, but they (poco) want the electrical contractor to install the disco ahead of the meter......from our stand point, that a big ol' no, he installs after meter, ahead of meter is all poco
 
I have heard of it but never worked with it. Most poco's won't allow it. I think you need to be careful here because once you hit that disconnect then you must use 4 wires in the meter can and the neutral will have to be isolated from the can. I believe they make them but it another expense. You should not need another disconnect on the load side of the meter.
 
Bypass meter will not kill the power on the load side of the meter. I can't imagine why they need that as they seldom have to get into the meter.
 
the argurment i'm hearing is "it's 480 volts so we need to keep our guys safe" i've done some big work and never seen or heard of this. maybe they don't employ linemen. is there something on the nesc i'm missing ? wheres mark handler or dennis alwhon ? or an electrical enginner
 
Dennis said:
I think you need to be careful here because once you hit that disconnect then you must use 4 wires in the meter can and the neutral will have to be isolated from the can.
Would 250.142(B) exception 2 allow this? Hope so, I have done it before.
 
chris kennedy said:
Would 250.142(B) exception 2 allow this? Hope so, I have done it before.
Yes, that would work as long as those conditions are met. As I said I never did it and did not know of the exception.
 
Dennis said:
Yes, that would work as long as those conditions are met. As I said I never did it and did not know of the exception.
Yeah, I'm going through my old pics, pretty sure it was one of the State Lab jobs.
 
codeworks said:
the argurment i'm hearing is "it's 480 volts so we need to keep our guys safe" i've done some big work and never seen or heard of this. maybe they don't employ linemen. is there something on the nesc i'm missing ? wheres mark handler or dennis alwhon ? or an electrical enginner
I am Dennis Alwon :o , and I have heard that some people have had to buy a special meter. Now with 3 phase 480v there may be some ground fault protection involved so it may not be allowed. I don't mean GFCI but rather the adjustable ground fault in the larger main breakers.
 
+ = +

Chris,

Isn't this sort of connection "atypical"?......How many experienced electricians,

or even inspectors, are going to be able to approve this, regardless of the

POCO mandate / desires?......If I were the AHJ, I would want something in

writing "REQUESTING" / justifying this expense.

= + =
 
Dennis said:
I am Dennis Alwon :o
OP is looking for Dennis Alwhon.

Now with 3 phase 480v there may be some ground fault protection involved so it may not be allowed.
230.95 only requires it at 1000A and up, that type of service is CT metered so I'm guessing the OP's service in question is fairly small.

north star said:
+ = +Chris,

Isn't this sort of connection "atypical"?......How many experienced electricians,

or even inspectors, are going to be able to approve this, regardless of the

POCO mandate / desires?......If I were the AHJ, I would want something in

writing "REQUESTING" / justifying this expense.

= + =
Absolutely, thats why I'm trying to find a pic. Here the poco (FLP) white book says that disco's, wireways with taps, splice boxes, ect... ahead of metering equip is a no-no, yet often my installs may require one of the above and FPL hooks me right up. On larger commercial jobs there is quite a bit of dancing around with poco during design stages.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
= < > =



Might be a good time for " codeworks' " AHJ to have some

communicado with the POCO asking some questions as to

why.....Unfunded / unjustified mandates don't set too well

with consumers, especially since they [ we ] are the

ones picking up the bill. :censored

= < > =
 
chris kennedy said:
OP is looking for Dennis Alwhon. 230.95 only requires it at 1000A and up, that type os service is CT metered so I'm guessing the OP's service in question is fairly small.
Good point. That's why they give you the commercial jobs and me the residential jobs. :) Usually over 400 amps it is a CT setup although I had a local poco engineer tell me I could do 500 amps with a 320 amp meter base.:confused: I said I don't think so.
 
thanks all for the information. i greatly appreciate it. dennis thru me for a loop with that "mild" photo gallery lol! i'm still unsure what's going on out there, i was out yesterday.
 
codeworks said:
thanks all for the information. i greatly appreciate it. dennis thru me for a loop with that "mild" photo gallery lol! i'm still unsure what's going on out there, i was out yesterday.
I did not install that link under the amp meter in post #15. Must be an auto advertise thing- IDK.
 
Back
Top