Do you think this past an inspection?

[RJJ]

What is missing?

 

[jar546]

It probably PASSED an inspection somewhere along the line before you got there. Thank goodness for spray foam

 

[north star]

# # #

RJJ asked:

What is missing?

Maybe a pipe sleeve / relieving arch for the pipe passing through the footing.# # #

 

[Uncle Bob]

Should have been a Two-way clean out.

Uncle Bob

 

[RJJ]

Yes! I told them when the test was on that a sleeve or arch was needed to be installed. I told them at plan review. I told them at the time I issued the permit. I told them I would return and to check. They back filled both sides and concreted over. Told me it was in place. I told them to dig it up! They asked why? I said I need to see it. Good thing they used foam! I said if you can produce an ES report for the foam I would say ok! They finally decide to put a sleeve in. Gota love the job. Cost them 225.00 in re inspection fees.

Think they may put a sleeve in next time!

 

[RJJ]

I don't like street "T". There is a clean out inside the building 6' up stream and one off a y about 4' in the other direction.

 

[peach]

wouldn't think so... you have a couple of reasons why... (mine would be the relieving arch)

 

[Glennman CBO]

Per UPC, the 3034 PVC (as it appears to be) would not be allowed, due to being within 2 ft of the building. The cleanout, fittings serving the cleanout, and pipe extending through the foundation would be required to be piping approved for use inside a building (sch 40).

The cleanout would only need to be 2 way if there is not a cleanout inside the building. Otherwise, the "tee" needs to be approved drainage fitting (combo y or sweep).

The hole in the wall? Well, comments above say it all.