Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Appreciate the quick response sir!There is no prohibition in either the ICC A117.1 or the ADA/ABA Standards against doors swinging into the maneuvering clearances of another door.
Depending on the space around these doors and the jurisdiction, this might be considered "doors in a series". I've have jurisdictions call this situation that before (even though I disagree with them). Just wanted to share in case your jurisdiction has that same opinion.Appreciate the quick response sir!
I looked into TAS as well,under Chapter 4 there is a door in series which lists a minimum of 48” between doors in addition to the width of the door. But it is a different situation than the one attached…
It does list that the door maneuvering clearance can overlap, but in this situation it’s the door swing itself that is in the clearance..
Really appreciate the input and link. This is super helpful.Depending on the space around these doors and the jurisdiction, this might be considered "doors in a series". I've have jurisdictions call this situation that before (even though I disagree with them). Just wanted to share in case your jurisdiction has that same opinion.
As far as I'm aware, there's nothing saying doors cannot overlap the maneuvering clearances of other doors. Here's a link to something that applies to ADAS (probably applies to TAS too since my understanding is that TAS is mostly ADAS). My understanding the list in that link are the only times a door's swing cannot overlap another required clearance.
Appreciate the discussion, I am learning a lot just by having this conversation.Do both of these doors have closers? Could you argue that the door to the left has a hinge approach rather than a front approach?
If there's concern (code or practice) with the maneuvering clearance and door swing, removing the closer or calling for a hinge approach may be sufficient to get the maneuvering clearance out of the door swing.
It's possible. Most jurisdictions I've worked in wouldn't consider this doors in a series. There is one, however, that would undoubtable consider this doors in a series.You think this could be an issue if these are considered a series of doors?