EERO Conundrum

[Sifu]

One of the reasons for minimum sizes in an EERO is for fire fighter access.

From the commentary "The minimum of 20" for the width is based on two criteria: the width necessary to place a ladder within the window opening and the width necessary to admit a fire-fighter with full rescue equipment, including breathing apparatus. The minimum 24" height is based on the minimum size necessary to admit a fire-fighter with full rescue equipment." Clearly the code intends the minimum size to be for more than just jumping out.

Of course I would approve an EERO over a roof, as long as that roof is navigable by rescue personnel. If a fire fighter can put a ladder to the roof, then walk across the roof to rescue the occupant then it is fine. But in this case, Not only is the structural ability for that roof to carry a fire fighter in doubt, but the surface would certainly be a problem with rain, ice or snow. Add to that, the probable occupant is elderly, and unable to safely navigate that roof.

I guess its just my interpretation, but I will err on the side of caution.

 

[cda]

Just get the 36 foot ladder off the truck, probie

 

[Yikes]

...necessary to admit a fire-fighter ...

That's the "R" in EERO.