• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Egress clearance

On egress, clearance, and stand pipes, some changes anticipated - approved by committee- in next edition of ANSI A117.1. Now, that MN ay be several years but still likely.
 
I don’t know about the Ontario Building Code, but in the IBC landing dimensions are based on "direction of travel".
Because an intermediate landing essentially has people traveling in a 180 degree arc around the inner handrail, the direction of landing measurement constantly changes as it follows this arc of travel; it does not get measured straight.

1011.6 Stairway Landings

There shall be a floor or landing at the top and bottom of each stairway. The width of landings, measured perpendicularly to the direction of travel, shall be not less than the width of stairways served. Every landing shall have a minimum depth, measured parallel to the direction of travel, equal to the width of the stairway or 48 inches (1219 mm), whichever is less.
 
Depends on the calculated exit width. (Ie: is it code minimum, or wider due to exit width from occupancy per 3.4.3.2(1))

Code reference for limiting the obstruction to be no more than the exit width is 3.4.3.3(1).

FYI: I'm assuming a part 3 building given the standpipe.
 
Your exit width is set 3.4.3.2.(OBC) based on occupancy load and a few other factors. The stairs are by definition an exit. From the top right down to the discharge door. The width would need to be maintained throughout the stairs. Exceptions that allow things to protrude into the exit are contained in 3.4.3.4. (OBC).

If there is not an exception allowing something to reduce the exit width, no reduction would be permitted.
 
Your exit width is set 3.4.3.2.(OBC) based on occupancy load and a few other factors. The stairs are by definition an exit. From the top right down to the discharge door. The width would need to be maintained throughout the stairs. Exceptions that allow things to protrude into the exit are contained in 3.4.3.4. (OBC).

If there is not an exception allowing something to reduce the exit width, no reduction would be permitted.
Understood.

My question basically comes down to:

can the exit width be measured as the radius centered at the nose of the handrail shown in the picture given in my post? Which clause in OBC allows this measurement?
 
Understood.

My question basically comes down to:

can the exit width be measured as the radius centered at the nose of the handrail shown in the picture given in my post? Which clause in OBC allows this measurement?
There is nothing that would indicate if it must be measured as a semi-circle as shown, or rectangular.

Ultimately this would be up to the building official. When the code does not specify something like this, it would be up to their interpretation.
 
Understood.

My question basically comes down to:

can the exit width be measured as the radius centered at the nose of the handrail shown in the picture given in my post? Which clause in OBC allows this measurement?
That is what I typically see on drawings. It allows for the standpipe to remain in the corner and not foul the egress path.
 
Back
Top