Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
AKA taxpayerscda said:School district is suppose to take special need education and expenses
I believe there are multiple children in the classroom. Would you consider a man-trap safer / more compliant than the other proposed solutions? If one door is open, nobody can open the other door. I have not found mantraps addressed anywhere in the IBC. Have you?cda said:the trouble is not enough info:if this was the only child in the room, there could be a vast ways to do it, but if you have a special needs child main streaming, than you have to take care of all the children in the classroom, so I would say no to hardware over 48" if more children
how about a man trap?????
Thanks Charles. That's exactly what I suggested. The consultant is just trying to come up with some solutions to recommend, so he can be prepared to discuss them with the AHJ.cda said:I think one of the special locking arrangements would have to apply As far as the special needs classroom maybe a meeting between the school and building dept and door hardware supplier might be the best idea
i would no allow door hardware mounted above 48 inches as it conflicts with too many codes.LGreene said:Would you allow hardware mounted above 48" in this case? How high is too high?
Lori,brudgers said:In my opinion, the life-safety needs of the many out weigh the inconvenience of proper staffing by the school district. I will add that a fenced courtyard outside would solve the issue without compromising safety. Of course there isn't door hardware involved in that solution. But all the world isn't a nail.
If the doors don't open in the way that people expect, Life Safety is compromised. The district can't just turn occupancy E into occupancy I.LGreene said:Thanks Charles. That's exactly what I suggested. The consultant is just trying to come up with some solutions to recommend, so he can be prepared to discuss them with the AHJ.
If we're just talking about one classroom door and the site plan allows, a fenced area that is large enough would be a good solution. I'll be interested to see how this works out and what solution the local AHJ allows.Papio Bldg Dept said:Lori,In my opinion, this is the best, and completely compliant, solution to your problem (unless of course you need to fence in the whole buildng).
A variance is when you break the rules under a specific set of circumstances and is generally considered inferior to the prescriptive path. An "Alternate Solution" is what we use in Canada since it implies that what you are doing is just as good as the code given specific construction materials/methods that are not directly addressed by the code.LGreene said:What should they call it?
Thanks Jim. That's one of the solutions that the hardware consultant is going to discuss with the AHJ. I'll report back when they decide what to do.JimWalsh said:How about using a "Wandergaurd" type system. The runner would have a bracelet or fob on his person that would lock the doors when he approached unless the teacher or supervisor allowed egress. the doors in question could be put on a timer so that the child could leave during scheduled recess & misc. The doors are typically locked with maglocks that would need to be tied to the fire system. This type of system is most often used in assisted living facilities with alzheimers patients, and O.B. areas of hospitals to make sure babies are not stolen. Good luck.