Re: exempting ANSI 117.7
The new one has a 1000 sf exception for employee work areas, doesn't require an accessible route in facilities that don't use "pedestrian paths" between buildings, etc.
The problem with the new ADAAG was that it was designed to turn A117.1 into Federal regulation, not to insure that accessibility was not diminished.
Of course the other problem is that it's now two "Icks" old, being based on IBC 2003.
When you bring your head out, I suggest you read the original ADAAG.Gene Boecker said:The weaker requirements in the A117.1????I suggest you look over the proposed ADA/ABA. The text is almost exactly the same as the 2003 A117.1. A117.1 has incorporated the more current thinking of the DoJ and Access Board (e.g. reach range, door approach, accessible egress). Bring your head out into the sunshine a bit more.
The new one has a 1000 sf exception for employee work areas, doesn't require an accessible route in facilities that don't use "pedestrian paths" between buildings, etc.
The problem with the new ADAAG was that it was designed to turn A117.1 into Federal regulation, not to insure that accessibility was not diminished.
Of course the other problem is that it's now two "Icks" old, being based on IBC 2003.