• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

existing building property line walls CBC

rick stone

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2012
Messages
1
I have an existing building probably mid 1970's.

Problem is existing property line walls with 0 distance, non-rated (I think) and no parapets.

We are not touching the walls except on the inside we are stripping the inside layer of drywall, adding 1/2" plywood and 5/8" type 'x' gyp. bd.

It already has 7/8" stucco on outside, so we in effect 1-houring the wall.

The property line walls do not have the required 30" parapet, and adding the parapet would require too much work and total re-design work.

The alternative is 705.11 exception 4. I'm don't think the existing roof can handle the extra weight of two layers of drywall.

Section 3403.1 of the california building code appears to limit the requirements for existing buildings stating 'Alterations..........to ensure that no less conforming than prior to the addition"

Actually we are upgrading to 1-hr. and fire blocking the wall, so it is more conforming than the existing.

We want to leave it at that and not overstress the existing roof with drywall or alter the building design with a new parapet.

Want to make sure though that I'm interpreting this right.

Thanks much
 
~ & ~ & ~

rick stone,

Welcome to the Building Codes Forum ! 8-)

Is there an RDP involved with the design of this project ?.........Assembling \

installing fire rated assemblies usually involves an RDP being actively

involved ?

~ & ~ & ~
 
I do not see any reason to require additional work beyond what you are doing. You are improving an existing non-compliant situation in the area of the work. To require more would make owners and contractors shy away from getting permits thus making them criminals and subject to jail time.
 
Back
Top