Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
My educated guess: the original plans were submitted with the temporary seating shown and were approved.Coug Dad said:It just seems odd that approval was reported to be given and the seats installed. Three weeks before the game and all of a sudden there is a problem? Something does not pass the smell test.
Politically, that would be virtually impossible. You can bet that the issue was discussed at many levels before the final decision was made. My guess is that any approval was made in general terms, and much like brudgers described, the actual installation just didn't cut it.Coug Dad said:I hope that these seats were denied for legitimate reasons and not just a egotistical bureaucratic power play.
It was the fire marshal.incognito said:IF the seating area is not found to be structurally deficient or egress substantially different than originally submitted the nitwit inspectors should be fired. No room for egotistical jerks in this profession.