• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

Firefighters want new codes to protect them from rooftop solar panels

Piedmont, CA web site has them on the 1997 UBC and 2001 CBC, not much code in UBC chapter 13 to enforce in regards to solar.

pc1
 
Pcinspector1 said:
Piedmont, CA web site has them on the 1997 UBC and 2001 CBC, not much code in UBC chapter 13 to enforce in regards to solar.pc1
Their website is out of date, which is typical.

Every jurisdiction in CA is currently on 2010 CA Building Standards Code.

They may have adopted local amendments, but they have no choice in being on the current codes.
 
For sprinklered buildings testing has shown that smoke and heat vents may result in worse fire outcomes (ie total loss) than for buildings without due to interaction with the sprinklers potentially causing too many heads to open. This is even more pronounced with ESFR heads.

Even for unsprinklered buildings automatic smoke and heat vents will result in the firefighters having a bigger fire to fight when they get there. Increased ventilation results in increased burning rates. Ventilating before having hose lines in place can get you into alot of trouble as the fire will be drawn to the vents. Think of opening the dampers on a woodstove vs tightening them down the burn rate goes way up when the dampers are opened. The same happens in a structure fire when smoke and heat vents open.

Shutting the door to a room on fire will greatly reduce the burning rate, smoke and fire spread even if it is a nonrated hollow wood door. This will greatly increase the time for fire department response and setup.
 
Frank said:
For sprinklered buildings testing has shown that smoke and heat vents may result in worse fire outcomes (ie total loss) than for buildings without due to interaction with the sprinklers potentially causing too many heads to open. This is even more pronounced with ESFR heads. Even for unsprinklered buildings automatic smoke and heat vents will result in the firefighters having a bigger fire to fight when they get there. Increased ventilation results in increased burning rates. Ventilating before having hose lines in place can get you into alot of trouble as the fire will be drawn to the vents. Think of opening the dampers on a woodstove vs tightening them down the burn rate goes way up when the dampers are opened. The same happens in a structure fire when smoke and heat vents open.

Shutting the door to a room on fire will greatly reduce the burning rate, smoke and fire spread even if it is a nonrated hollow wood door. This will greatly increase the time for fire department response and setup.
I've never understood why they are allowed to do that, it's even worse than putting sprinkler heads over ranges.
 
Systems with micro inverters (enphase system) will quit generating power when the main panel is turned off, other systems need a rooftop DC disconnect so there will not be any power source in the conduit.
 
David Henderson said:
Systems with micro inverters (enphase system) will quit generating power when the main panel is turned off, other systems need a rooftop DC disconnect so there will not be any power source in the conduit.
assuming they are installed and inspected correctly. I think the firefighters are right... just like they have modified (in some areas anyway) how they deal with car accidents involving hybrids/full electric cars.
 
Top