@ = @ = @
Jeff,
IMO, it might be because to adopt newer editions would cost
the RDP's money for them to purchase the Code; maybe
even multiple copies [ i.e. - hardcopy & electronic ], ...get training
and "up to speed" on all the changes, and to now say NEC
2014 on all their plans, when in the past & currently, all they
have to do is tell a junior office person to "cut & paste" everything
from the 2008.......It [ might ] be one way of maximizing the
organization' profits.
And let's face it, ...every three years is too frequent !......Is four
years too frequent, ...what about five, or six, or later ?
The 3-Year cycles are fine for those entities developing, printing
& selling their products to the masses, but from "the masses" side
of the counter, there are very real limitations on resources [ i.e. -
time & money ] to use on buying the updated editions, ...for there
to be language specific to that jurisdiction included in the adoption
process, ...for the Legal Beagles to vette the proposed language
before adopting, ...[ hopefully ] to take the time to advertise to the
public that updated Codes & Standards will be adopted & enforced
beginning on " xxx " date, and as always, ...for there to be time
for the Inspectors to actually read & understand the updated
Codes & Standards that they are expected to enforce.
The adoption process is a lengthy effort that should be scrutinized
& vetted very carefully, so that the documents being adopted can be
used for a lengthy amount of time, and not just by some administrative
action by executive committee signatures.
@ = @ = @