• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

Friction in the Courts

Emills

Registered User
Joined
May 9, 2021
Messages
2
Location
Garnett, KS
Greetings, all!

I've run into a little problem with our Municipal Court here, and I'm wondering if anyone else has run into it as well.

I'm the Building Official/Zoning Administrator in a small rural town, with one employee, the Codes/Nuisance/Animal Control Officer. Recently, the Municipal Court Judge has determined, and subsequently ordered, that anytime we issue a NTA, it has to be accompanied by an affidavit attesting to the truthfulness of the information included in the NTA. Her logic is that, inasmuch as we're not certified law enforcement officers, we don't have control over our own signature.

Our municipal code states expressly that both of our positions are authorized to enforce the provisions of the Municipal Code to which my department has been assigned. And those that are not specifically assigned to my dept, are assigned to us on the authority of the City Manager.

The solution for me is simple. I was at one time a certified full-time law enforcement officer here in Kansas. I can have my certification reinstated, and I'm off to the races. My dude, on the other hand, would have to attend the academy to obtain such a certification, which we just can't afford right now. I'll be taking a plea to the judge today to eliminate the requirement, but I doubt I'll be successful. I've got the pertinent portions of our Municipal Code, as well as state statute to back me up, but I just don't see it happening. I've also got the backing of the City Attorney, which one would hope should bolster my argument.

So, my questions are these: Has anyone run into this situation elsewhere? If so, how did you handle it?

Thanks for any guidance anyone might be able to provide.
 
Thanks, I've been thinking about that. The Judge is appointed by the City Manager (my boss), who is well aware of the situation. He agrees it's unreasonable (the family-friendly term we use), and he's aware of other rulings and orders she's made that could be considered...questionable. He's the Mgr in an interim capacity right now, and I think he may defer until he receives permanent appointment, or they appoint someone else. Can't say as I blame him.

Someone also suggested taking it to the District Court. I don't have standing to challenge an administrative order from a Municipal Judge in the District Court. And, even if I did, I'd be getting labeled as one who is willing to argue with a judge, and the subsequent target on my back that would follow.
 
The NTA for what you do should be the same as a parking ticket. Most parking enforcement personnel are not certified law enforcement people. How does she handle parking tickets?
 
Is it possibly that the City Manager can request a Certified Officer present the case in court before the Judge and use your Codes Officer with his Affidavit in hand as a witness of the crime?
 
I feel like she s treating administrative law like criminal law. There is a much lower standard to be met (typically) with administrative law given that it lacks the stigma that goes with criminal law.
 
Off-topic: If your position requires you to get re-certified as a LEO, my guess is that you would be eligible additional pay and benefits associated with the certification.
 
Greetings, all!

I've run into a little problem with our Municipal Court here, and I'm wondering if anyone else has run into it as well.

I'm the Building Official/Zoning Administrator in a small rural town, with one employee, the Codes/Nuisance/Animal Control Officer. Recently, the Municipal Court Judge has determined, and subsequently ordered, that anytime we issue a NTA, it has to be accompanied by an affidavit attesting to the truthfulness of the information included in the NTA. Her logic is that, inasmuch as we're not certified law enforcement officers, we don't have control over our own signature.

Our municipal code states expressly that both of our positions are authorized to enforce the provisions of the Municipal Code to which my department has been assigned. And those that are not specifically assigned to my dept, are assigned to us on the authority of the City Manager.

The solution for me is simple. I was at one time a certified full-time law enforcement officer here in Kansas. I can have my certification reinstated, and I'm off to the races. My dude, on the other hand, would have to attend the academy to obtain such a certification, which we just can't afford right now. I'll be taking a plea to the judge today to eliminate the requirement, but I doubt I'll be successful. I've got the pertinent portions of our Municipal Code, as well as state statute to back me up, but I just don't see it happening. I've also got the backing of the City Attorney, which one would hope should bolster my argument.

So, my questions are these: Has anyone run into this situation elsewhere? If so, how did you handle it?

Thanks for any guidance anyone might be able to provide.
It is my unedeerstanding that Code Enforcement is a Public Safety Area and that is why Common Law says we have POLICE Powers just like Plolice but without the Gun
So it seems fromthat view, we have the same authoizations as does a Police Officer.

I hope you'll reort back that explanation moves the ball down thefield
 
Top