greenbubba
Member
LGBT restrooms was a hot issue even before current political games, but Uni-Sex single hole accessible toilet rooms seem to be an easy work around. For my institution, we have a decent amount of single hole rooms since it is often the most effective method of compliance in older buildings.
Now the debate about signage is arising. I'd appreciate any input regarding how this is playing out across the world, and if a consensus is forming. This article neatly sums up my understanding of the LGBT community concerns. The required male/female symbol is essentially what stirs the pot, since there is no accepted symbol for Trans. Right now my recommendation is to stick with current uni-sex symbols and change text however you like, then change the signs later if/when a acceptable symbol is the norm.
http://lgbtweekly.com/2015/02/19/a-restroom-pictogram-that-sends-the-wrong-message/
Now the debate about signage is arising. I'd appreciate any input regarding how this is playing out across the world, and if a consensus is forming. This article neatly sums up my understanding of the LGBT community concerns. The required male/female symbol is essentially what stirs the pot, since there is no accepted symbol for Trans. Right now my recommendation is to stick with current uni-sex symbols and change text however you like, then change the signs later if/when a acceptable symbol is the norm.
http://lgbtweekly.com/2015/02/19/a-restroom-pictogram-that-sends-the-wrong-message/