• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Geotech review overkill?

Yikes

SAWHORSE
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
4,103
Location
Southern California
My structural engineer's plans for a generic site light post footing includes this note:
1684966374926.png
I've never had geotech review a generic solid footing for a lamppost for "Waterproofing" or "Drainage system". Here's the detail:

1684966528634.png

Under what scenario might waterproofing or drainage be an issue for a lamppost footing? Am I missing something, or is this just CYA by my structural engineer?
 
The engineer must have confused your project with another. Perhaps he hit a wrong button. Will you have any of that stuff? If you do, I am curious about the drainage system.
 
How big is that Ftng? What is the rebar specified to be and what kind of soil do you have where you will be installing this? All of those make a difference although I've never seen a requirement that strict for a lamp base
 
& * &

Yikes, there are a lot of variables and maybe's here......Maybe it's a CYA Factor, ...maybe
the soils there are unstable, ...maybe a high acidic condition, ...maybe it's a
"revenue generator", ...maybe it is indeed a "hold over" \ generic statement included
on all their designs, ...maybe that GeoTech has an OCD level that's off the charts, and
on and on and on and on.


& * &
 
Last edited:
Back
Top