• Welcome to the new and improved Building Code Forum. We appreciate you being here and hope that you are getting the information that you need concerning all codes of the building trades. This is a free forum to the public due to the generosity of the Sawhorses, Corporate Supporters and Supporters who have upgraded their accounts. If you would like to have improved access to the forum please upgrade to Sawhorse by first logging in then clicking here: Upgrades

How Zoning Ordinances Shaped America's Car-Centric Society and Housing Affordability Crisis

jar546

Forum Coordinator
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
11,051
Location
Somewhere Too Hot & Humid
aerial-view-of-car-parking-2022-02-02-03-49-16-utc.jpg

"The Parking Predicament: How Zoning Ordinances Shaped America's Car-Centric Society and Housing Affordability Crisis"


The American dream of "the open road" in the 1940s and 1950s became a defining feature of U.S. culture. With the advent of the automobile, it seemed as though the country's vast expanses were an open canvas, waiting to be covered with highways and parking lots. However, what appeared as progress at the time has since revealed unintended consequences that continue to affect us today.

One of the significant contributors to America's car-centric society has been zoning ordinances that prioritized minimum parking requirements. While these regulations were initially well-intentioned, they have had far-reaching impacts on urban development, housing affordability, and the nation's tax base.

The Parking Plague: Affordable Housing and Lost Tax Revenue

In many American cities, zoning ordinances have demanded ample parking for businesses, residential buildings, and even public facilities. On the surface, this might seem like a prudent move to ensure adequate parking spaces for the growing number of cars. However, the unintended consequence has been the creation of vast parking lots that devour valuable urban land.

Consider this: a typical suburban shopping mall dedicates more land to parking than it does to actual retail space. The same principle applies to residential developments, office complexes, and educational institutions. This extensive allocation of land for parking not only diminishes the availability of land for other purposes, but it also reduces the taxable property base, leading to lower tax revenue for cities.

Moreover, the cost of constructing and maintaining these vast parking areas is substantial, a cost that is ultimately passed on to consumers and taxpayers. It's a hidden tax on everyone, with those who can afford it the least bearing the brunt of the burden.

The Proliferation of Urban Sprawl and Car Dependency

The car-centric zoning model has also encouraged urban sprawl. Cities that prioritized parking minimums inadvertently spread themselves thin instead of building up with greater density and diversity. This phenomenon resulted in the creation of sprawling suburbs, necessitating long commutes and contributing to traffic congestion, air pollution, and increased fuel consumption.

The absence of mixed-use areas, where residential, commercial, and recreational spaces coexist, has further entrenched car dependency. Residents often find themselves compelled to drive for even the most basic daily needs, from groceries to medical appointments, due to the separation of land uses and lack of pedestrian-friendly environments.

The Missed Opportunities for Public Transportation

While Europe and other parts of the world invested in robust public transportation systems, the U.S. lagged behind, primarily due to the allure of the automobile. Passenger rail systems, which thrive in densely populated areas, were often sidelined in favor of expanding highways and accommodating more cars.

A Path Forward: Rethinking Zoning and Urban Planning

It's time to reconsider the impact of parking-centric zoning ordinances on our communities. To address the affordable housing crisis, ***** tax revenues, and reduce car dependency, cities should:

  1. Revise Parking Requirements: Cities should reevaluate and revise their parking requirements to match actual demand, considering factors such as proximity to public transit and walkability.
  2. Promote Mixed-Use Development: Encourage mixed-use zoning that allows for a blend of residential, commercial, and recreational spaces, creating vibrant, walkable neighborhoods.
  3. Invest in Public Transportation: Prioritize investments in public transportation, including passenger rail systems, to provide alternatives to car travel and reduce congestion.
  4. Implement Smart Growth Policies: Embrace smart growth policies that emphasize compact, sustainable, and efficient land use patterns.
The car-centric zoning legacy of the mid-20th century may have shaped the American landscape, but it's time to reshape our communities for a more sustainable and equitable future. By reimagining zoning ordinances, we can create cities that are affordable, vibrant, and less dependent on cars, ultimately benefiting both current and future generations.
 
NO. What came first the chicken or the egg?
What came first the automobile or the regulations to govern and provide space for them at public accommodating facilities?
What was more cost effective at the time? Require business owners to provide parking onsite or the taxpayer to pay for the construction and ongoing maintenance cost of a mass transit system?
 
This does not explain The high cost of housing in several large cities like New York, Chicago, LA, San Francisco, San Diego, as well as several other cities that do not have parking requirements for most housing projects.
 
Last edited:
Several cities (LA, San Francisco, San Diego, etcetera) have
  1. Revised Parking Requirements
  2. they are Promoting Mixed-Use Development
  3. Have Invested in Public Transportation and have
  4. Implemented Smart Growth Policies
Yet the rental costs are some of the highest in the nation
 
Current parking policies and land valuation methods lead to inefficient land use, increased traffic, and misallocation of resources. Current parking policies and land valuation methods lead to inefficient land use, increased traffic, and misallocation of resources. Parking minimums result in more parking than needed, reducing financial productivity and creating underutilized spaces. Parking spaces are often taxed less than buildings, discouraging property improvements.
 
Top