• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

I hate when this happens

ICE

MODERATOR
Staff member
Joined
Jun 23, 2011
Messages
13,929
Location
California
Driving down the street one day I spot a work in progress without permits. I stopped to check out what was going on. The only people there were workmen. I asked for permission to go inside. I got as far as where the kitchen used to be when a workman put a phone in front of me. The owner was called and he told me to get off of his property. I obliged.

In the minute that I was there, I spotted a kitchen and bathroom remodel, window replacement and a carport that had been enclosed. I wrote correction to obtain permits. I included a correction that the new bedroom windows do not meet egress requirements and the green muck in the swimming pool must be removed.

It all went down hill from there. The owner, a self described house flipper, obtained permits for a bathroom remodel and raise the flat roof to a gable. The swimming pool has an expired permit so he got one of those too.

The enclosed carport lacked any permit and was an eyesore so Flipper decided to remove the walls and get it permitted as a carport. Upon seeing it as a carport Flipper decided that it was too rough to keep and tore it down.

Then we found permits for the carport and a permit to enclose the carport. When given that bit of news, Flipper flipped out...talk about an aggrieved party. Naturally we are now a bunch of morons with too much authority. That's only true about half of the time.

Flipper filed a claim to be reimbursed for the missing enclosed carport and has proceeded with construction.

1&2 are the first day.

The picture that I don't have is the roll-off in the driveway and the enclosed carport. I must be slipping. There was two bathrooms and a kitchen in the bin.

DSCN4368-1.jpg


2. We make our own luck in this world.

DSCN4374.jpg


This was a drive by.

The day that Flipper bought the property, a for rent sign appeared. When Flipper applied for permits, it was explained to him that licensed contractors are required because the property is a rental. That was the moment that Flipper decided that he would live there. The for rent sign is mistake.

DSCN5722.jpg


This day I was asked to have a look at the bathroom remodel. I explained the need for permits and plans if they start tearing out walls.

DSCN7527-2.jpg


DSCN7530-1.jpg


Flipper heard something else.

We are now four months into the project and a framing inspection was requested.

The front 600 sq. ft. of the house has been torn down and a new bunch of construction has taken it's place.

There are no permits or plans for the new construction. The workman called Flipper and I was told again just how backward my organization is. Silly me, I didn't know that Flipper has a get out of jail free card because he is going to sue us for the entire, life devastating, event. Perhaps he is better at legal stuff than he is with construction....he's a mammal out of water when it comes to building anything.

I told him that the request for framing inspection was premature and then went in search of the next unwilling participant.

DSCN8237.jpg


I better stop by on Monday and tell him that he needs another roll-off. We can't have trash blowing in the wind....what with this being his new home and all, it's best not to insult the neighbors before he even moves in....Shirley he'll understand.

And by the way, the framing is a mess....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Then we found permits for the carport and a permit to enclose the carport
If it has been on the tax role for more than 15 years we do not require anything since our records are sporadic prior to that time frame.

If it not the same owner as when it did go on the tax role then we do not worry about a permit we just work with the current owner to make sure as much as possible is code compliant.

Same owner and no permit different ball game
 
The pool is not in bad condition. So would you guys apply the current electrical code to the pool since a new permit is required to replace an expired permit from 2002? That would be a $5000 surprise. I hate dealing with swimming pools that have little to no record of inspection.

DSCN7521-1.jpg


It seems odd that Edison allowed a pool so close to their pole. Or is it, UhOh! Maybe they didn't.

DSCN4369-1.jpg


Aw shucks, I just noticed the patio cover....here's hoping they tore it down....by accident of course.

There's little doubt as to who lost that fight.

DSCN4369-2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ICE said:
The pool is not in bad condition. So would you guys apply the current electrical code to the pool since a new permit is required to replace an expired permit from 2002? That would be a $5000 surprise. I hate dealing with swimming pools that have little to no record of inspection.
DSCN7521-1.jpg


It seems odd that Edison allowed a pool so close to their pole. Or is it, UhOh! Maybe they didn't.

DSCN4369-1.jpg


Aw shucks, I just noticed the patio cover....here's hoping they tore it down....by accident of course.

There's little doubt as to who lost that fight.

DSCN4369-2.jpg
Ice,

Power pole is close so that the owner can turn the existing pool into a "HOT TUB"........

Sue
 
there are power lines attached I believe, see the transformer on the pole in the background (middle photo of ICE's post) looks line lines come from that pole to the top of the pool at the pool
 
mark handler said:
And you do know those are not "power" lines.....they are phone or cable tv lines.
The rat's nest is a few hundred feet of who knows what. It's nothing to do with the power company. Most likely cable.
 
There is no permit for the sub-panel in the bedroom closet. I inspected it anyway figuring that if it's wrong they will fix those deficiencies when they move the panel.

DSCN8269.jpg


I walked across the sheets of osb.

DSCN8273.jpg


Can you spot what tripped me up?

DSCN8270.jpg


Does this help?

DSCN8272.jpg


It makes me wonder if they did this on purpose.

DSCN8271.jpg
 
The porch did come out over the steps. It encroached into the setback so it had to be cut back. I didn't catch it at footing inspection. I didn't have a camera back then and I passed by the other day.

DSCN8483.jpg
 
ICE said:
The porch did come out over the steps. It encroached into the setback so it had to be cut back. I didn't catch it at footing inspection. I didn't have a camera back then and I passed by the other day.
So it was missed by planning and building department plan check also?
 
mark handler said:
So it was missed by planning and building department plan check also?
Oh No...just me...at least that's what I was led to believe. It is altogether possible that the forms were moved after I gave an approval but it's just as likely that I missed it. The job took a long time between inspections and I can't remember everything. In any event, I shouldered the blame.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ICE said:
There is no permit for the sub-panel in the bedroom closet. I inspected it anyway figuring that if it's wrong they will fix those deficiencies when they move the panel.
DSCN8269.jpg


I walked across the sheets of osb.

DSCN8273.jpg


Can you spot what tripped me up?

DSCN8270.jpg


Does this help?

DSCN8272.jpg


It makes me wonder if they did this on purpose.

DSCN8271.jpg
spike strips to slow down inspectors?
 
Back
Top