• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Inspectors Who Hurt the Industry

One of the comments that keeps popping up on my TikTok videos is “Why bother pulling a permit if the inspector isn’t going to look at anything?” That is not just trolling. That is a legitimate criticism of our profession, and it should make every inspector stop and think.

We all know there are inspectors who show up, shoot the breeze with the contractor, sign off the job, and drive away without ever looking at the work. They think they are being friendly, they think they are avoiding conflict, or maybe they are just burned out and going through the motions. Whatever the reason, they are damaging this profession and giving all of us a bad name.

On the other end of the spectrum are the inspectors who turn every inspection into a power trip. They invent rules that do not exist in the code. They write contractors up because it is “their way” or “the way they did it in the trade.” They create failures out of nothing because they think passing an inspection without writing something up means they are not doing their job. In reality, it just shows they do not know their job.

So here we are stuck between two extremes. On one side, the pass everything inspector who cannot enforce the minimum standards. On the other side, the "my way" inspector who forces personal preferences instead of the actual code. Both are poison. Both destroy credibility. One creates an environment where substandard work passes for years until another jurisdiction finally enforces the code. The other creates resentment and mistrust because contractors feel like they are being shaken down by an inspector on a power trip.

This is not complicated. The job of an inspector is to enforce the minimum code. Nothing more. Nothing less. The code is the standard. Not your opinion. Not your mood. Not your fear of confrontation. And not your personal history in the trade.

The inspectors who pass everything and the inspectors who make up their own rules both fail the public. They also fail the contractors who actually care about doing things right. Worst of all, they fail to uphold the credibility of our profession. Every time one of these inspectors walks off a site, they reinforce the idea that permits and inspections are a joke.

I care deeply about this industry. That is why I am saying this bluntly. If you recognize yourself in either of these categories, you need to take a hard look at why you are still doing this job. The public deserves better. The contractors deserve better. And our profession deserves better.
 
My favorite is this one inspector in my area. Nice guy usually.

I happened to be around for one of his inspections - a drywall inspection. He walks into the building, up to the contractor, says "I've never seen bad drywall nailing, so I usually just pass it," then leaves. I don't think he even looked at a wall close enough to see nails.

Two days later I happen to be around for another inspection. Different project, same inspector. This time, he was looking at accessibility elements. He looks around for a few minutes, then went on a 10 minute rant about how the business owner need to take care of all of these accessibility issues and he couldn't issue a TCO because that would be "certifying that the space is accessible, which its not". He asked for a laundry list of improvements that weren't actually required for the project and he held his CASp certification over the owner, contractor, and me like he's superior because of that (both the contractor and I are also CASps...). Ended up doing a lot more work than what code actually required only because it was faster than fighting the inspector, and the business needed to open.

All that to say, even the same inspector can swing from one extreme to another.
 
The job of an inspector is to enforce the minimum code. Nothing more. Nothing less.
A plans examiners job is to ensure the plans meet the minimum codes.
The inspectors job is to ensure the construction is in compliance with the approved plans which will likely exceed the minimum code requirements in a number of areas.
 
A plans examiners job is to ensure the plans meet the minimum codes.
The inspectors job is to ensure the construction is in compliance with the approved plans which will likely exceed the minimum code requirements in a number of areas.
Well, the inspector enforces the minimum codes, because not every aspect of the project is in the plans. This has always been a balancing act, but both the plans examiner and the Inspector are crucial in the enforcement of minimum standards.
 
A plans examiners job is to ensure the plans meet the minimum codes.
The inspectors job is to ensure the construction is in compliance with the approved plans which will likely exceed the minimum code requirements in a number of areas.

One of our former state building inspectors, back when we still had live in-service training, often told classes that "The code is the least you can accept, and the most you can require." Considering that he was an architect, I could never understand why he would say this.

The statement applies during the plan review process. As code officials, we can't require that the construction documents call for anything more than the minimum that the codes require. BUT ... design professionals often go beyond the code minimums. Once a department approves a set of construction documents and issues a building permit, the contractor doesn't have a permit to do whatever he wants as long as it meets the code minimums. He has a permit to construct what is shown on the approved construction documents. If that exceeds minimum requirements, then we are supposed to inspect the whatever the approved construction documents show, not to the code minimums.
 
we are supposed to inspect the whatever the approved construction documents show
Once computer generated plans became available the designers are able to point and click on the wrong stuff. They add all manner of information that has nothing to do with the project. It seems that they are selling the sizzle ‘cause there’s not much steak.
 
Your Quote: "This is not complicated. The job of an inspector is to enforce the minimum code. "

I agree but phrase it a little differently. I like to say there are 2 kinds of Inspectors, Those that APPLY the Code and Those who INFLICT the CODE
I also like to point out to those who believe that "Pullimg a Permit is like getting some Insurance. In a world where the "last Guy to be at the home, and something goes wrong, I hope that doesn't mean a loss of life, Well if you got a Permit for a clear scope of work and a 3rd Party (AKA Inspector , reviewed and signed off after an Inspection THEN whatever happen didn't have anything to do with you and your Insurance

The serious Contractors understood what that meant
 
The cranky old boomer said what? :p :p;)

But he's right.

Just look at that AI-generated plan review you received ...

It's not just AI. I routinely receive sets of construction documents that are filled with BS notes that don't pertain to the project I'm reviewing. It's just too easy with computers to recycle entire sheets of standard details, and nobody has the time to even put an 'X' through the ones that don't apply.
 
But he's right.

Just look at that AI-generated plan review you received ...

It's not just AI. I routinely receive sets of construction documents that are filled with BS notes that don't pertain to the project I'm reviewing. It's just too easy with computers to recycle entire sheets of standard details, and nobody has the time to even put an 'X' through the ones that don't apply.
There was a stretch when I was also tasked with plan checking. I would include a correction to remove everything that didn’t apply to the project. Forty pages would shrink to twenty. In the field I encountered elevator plans on single story buildings.
It is especially maddening when structural details that are on the plans but do not apply because they are not referenced anywhere on the plans.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top