Yikes
SAWHORSE
LOL, just missed Lori's response before I posted.
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
I have never seen a single-occupancy restroom that did not have a lock or a locking latch. How else is the entry door secured for privacy? Even water closet stalls have locks or latches on their doors.Technically....The deadbolt is not allowed...
1008.1.9.3 Locks and latches. Locks and latches shall be
permitted to prevent operation of doors where any of the following
exists:
My intention is to have a deadbolt, but no latching hardware.Doors equipped with both latching hardware and deadbolts must be openable with a single effort.
I have never seen a single-occupancy restroom that did not have a lock or a locking latch. How else is the entry door secured for privacy? Even water closet stalls have locks or latches on their doors.
That's still a lock and a latch. It seems that we're getting wrapped up in semantics now.A privacy set that unlocks when you hit the lever.....
That code does not say one motion to egress. It says one motion to unlatch a door. Opening the door would require an additional motion to push or pull the door open. (And technically, an additional additional motion is required to egress after opening the door.)One motion to egress...
1008.1.9.5 Unlatching. The unlatching of any door or leaf
shall not require more than one operation.
No...We are getting wrapped up in code....
Technically....The deadbolt is not allowed...
1008.1.9.3 Locks and latches. Locks and latches shall be
permitted to prevent operation of doors where any of the following
exists:...
As I have stated in another thread, I will be hiring an architectural firm to draft the set of plans that will be submitted for approval. I also intend to have a code compliance consultant review the final design. If there is push-back from the AHJ on anything, I'll let the architect and code compliance consultant handle it.As you may or may not chose to see Michael, your issue is both a performance (for you to prove) and a prescriptive (specific code compliance required). Based on your choice of business location and the opinions of a number of experts on this Forum, maybe you should hire a consultant to present your concerns and justifications for alternate methods and means to the local AHJ.