Mistery

[cda]

Anyone seen one of these yet???? Not mucjh info about them;:::

http://www.gwsprinkler.com/utcfs/ws-3298/Assets/GW_SN045_1001_B.pdf

 

[Frank]

It is listed as a sprinkler for deep fat fryer protection, additional protection is required for the hood and duct.

 

[FM William Burns]

No but interesting concept provided the listing (couldn't find) is correct and it can meet the sopification criteria of 96 and 17A

 

[RJJ]

No first time!

 

[Oldfieldguy]

No but interesting concept provided the listing (couldn't find) is correct and it can meet the sopification criteria of 96 and 17A

I checked the UTC Fire Protection website and the data sheet for US applications indicates it is listed (it's at the bottom of the paperwork):

http://www.utcfireandsecurity.com/_LAYOUTS/UTC.FS.Portal.Common/SubsidarySiteRedirector.aspx?siteurl=http://www.gwsprinkler.com

 

[fireguy]

http://ulstandardsinfonet.ul.com/scopes/scopes.asp?fn=1994.html

http://www.ul.com/global/documents/corporate/aboutul/publications/newsletters/ephregulator/EPH_2010_1_Spring.pdf

fire suppression standard for fryers, using a water bases foam

I expect by the time you ran water pipe to the hood, adding wet chemical nozzles to a UL300 systems would be less expensive

 

[cda]

http://ulstandardsinfonet.ul.com/scopes/scopes.asp?fn=1994.htmlhttp://www.ul.com/global/documents/corporate/aboutul/publications/newsletters/ephregulator/EPH_2010_1_Spring.pdf

fire suppression standard for fryers, using water

I expect by the time you ran water pipe to the hood, adding wet chemical nozzles to a UL300 systems would be less expensive

If the building has or is scheduled to have a sprinkler system than everything is there

Just have to pipe per 13