I assume guys prefer a urinal for that part of their business than a toilet? (I'm asking here). It's a single user facility no partition required (other issues, possibly).. I believe the IPC still has a big trade off for fixtures in the men's room (less toilets, more urinals)..
-
Welcome to The Building Code Forum
Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Multi-Occupant or Single Occupant
- Thread starter jar546
- Start date
Inspecting a residential remodel ...... I noticed a toilet that had an elongation that was longer than I had seen before or since. It looked like it might be for a hospital. I asked the owner about it and he said that he has six boys, from 1 to 12 years old.peach said:
Myself, I prefer a urinal filled with ice. Notice that it's not capitol letters.
Frank
REGISTERED
Urinal use vs toilet saves water
Bush use saves even more and fertilizes the bush
Bush use saves even more and fertilizes the bush
beach
REGISTERED
Biting tongue.......owwww :devil
Mech
REGISTERED
Is it a single-user or multi-user restroom? What is the approved occupant load for this restroom? 
I would not have a problem with a urinal and a water closet for the men. There could be a problem if they are using the urinal to meet the required fixture count while the room is only a single user restroom.
IMO, I'd call it a single user restroom.
I would not have a problem with a urinal and a water closet for the men. There could be a problem if they are using the urinal to meet the required fixture count while the room is only a single user restroom.
IMO, I'd call it a single user restroom.