• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

NEC vs IRC for Violations such as this one

jar546

CBO
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
12,938
Location
Not where I really want to be
I would still prefer to write up violations by referencing the NEC because I have known that book since 1987. I still struggle to find the code section for violations such as this one.

Is there a cross reference for these?

And BTW, what is the code reference for this????????????????

3/0 Copper service conductors to the panel from the meter base.

IMG_1753.jpg
 
TABLE E3702.1

GENERAL INSTALLATION AND SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS FOR WIRING METHODSa, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k

E3806.1 Conductors entering boxes, conduit bodies or fittings.

Conductors entering boxes, conduit bodies or fittings shall be protected from abrasion.

At least they put extra tape around the conductors

Shouldn't the pipe have been reamed?
 
The 2006 IRC has a cross reference to the 2005 in the back of it Appendix Q. That may help.

ICC INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE ELECTRICAL

PROVISIONS/NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE CROSS-REFERENCE
 
Jeff,

Others have provided the correct IRC cross references. Instead of reaming the pipe end, an

approved type of thermoplastic bushing could be installed and still be compliant.

.
 
If those are service conductors then then a standard lock nut could not be used for bonding especially around reducing washers, you would need to use a bonding bushing, not just a plastic bushing. (See 250.92(B) NEC) I don't have the time right now to get you the IRC reference.

Chris
 
raider1 said:
If those are service conductors then then a standard lock nut could not be used for bonding especially around reducing washers, you would need to use a bonding bushing, not just a plastic bushing. (See 250.92(B) NEC) I don't have the time right now to get you the IRC reference.Chris
Holy crap, you are right. I missed that!!!

One more piece of humble pie today.
 
globe trekker said:
Jeff, Instead of reaming the pipe end, an

approved type of thermoplastic bushing could be installed and still be compliant.

.
Nope, still have to ream it.

344.28 Reaming and Threading.All cut ends shall be reamed or otherwise finished to remove rough edges. Where conduit is threaded in the field, a standard cutting die with a 1 in 16 taper (¾-in. taper per foot) shall be used.
 
Back
Top