I am doing a code review for an existing fire / police department structure that will be retrofitted into a fire station. The facility will house business group B, storage group S-2 and residential group R-2. I am using IBC 2009, approaching this review as a non-separated residential R-2 (508.3).
Without going into too much detail, below is some pertinent info in regards to my question:
*Based on exception 2 (508.3.3) the sleeping units will still require a fire separation rating.
*Corridor walls will require a fire-resistant rating (1018.1)
My question is regarding the interpretation of non-separated use groups.
My approach as stated above; the other interpretation is that because we established our building as ‘non-separated’ all groups now become R-2 (eliminating S-2 & B) therefore the sleeping units are only adjacent to R-2 occupancies which deletes the rating requirement between different occupancies.
I there is the potential to have a different approach to this review however I am curious to see how other's interpret non-separated occupancies.
Without going into too much detail, below is some pertinent info in regards to my question:
*Based on exception 2 (508.3.3) the sleeping units will still require a fire separation rating.
*Corridor walls will require a fire-resistant rating (1018.1)
My question is regarding the interpretation of non-separated use groups.
My approach as stated above; the other interpretation is that because we established our building as ‘non-separated’ all groups now become R-2 (eliminating S-2 & B) therefore the sleeping units are only adjacent to R-2 occupancies which deletes the rating requirement between different occupancies.
I there is the potential to have a different approach to this review however I am curious to see how other's interpret non-separated occupancies.