• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

occupant load calculations for multiple occupancies

S

steve shaw

REGISTERED
Joined
May 29, 2018
Messages
8
Location
santa fe, new mexico
the logic of rounding up occupant load calculations makes sense. but if this is applied to each individual occupancy group in a multiple-occupancy tenant space, such a tenant would be penalized relative to single-use and there could be numerous 'phantom occupants'.
is there any reference limiting the 'rounding up' to the final / total count?
thanks.
 
“”there could be numerous 'phantom occupants'.””

As in you calculate 1.5 people, and there is only one???

Normally it does not matter.

Where it does, than argue the point

As in one person adds say, another exit, assembly occupancy, panic hardware, sprinkler or fire alarm system,,, ETC
 
There is no requirement that occupant loads must be rounded up. Typically, I round down; however, I have rounded up on occasion when the decimal number is X.9 or higher.

For areas where the occupant load is based on gross floor area, I take the total area of all spaces (i.e., gross floor area) and then divide by the occupant load factor and round down--that is the occupant load for the story. Where multiple load factors are used per story, I determine each as described, then sum the totals of each to determine the occupant load for the story. For areas using net floor area, I determine by each space and round down and then add them to the other totals based on gross floor areas to get the occupant load for the story.

Each space is required to provide for the means of egress of the space's occupant load per IBC Section 107.2.3, so I determine the occupant load of each space to show compliance (rounding down as I've mentioned previously), but I do not add up the rounded occupant loads of each space to determine the occupant load of a story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JBI
Occupant load is used primarily to size the means of egress, so adding a few more people may require a larger MOE.
In the extreme it could raise additional code requirements as noted above by cda. The language in 1004 of the IBC allows an increase in occupant load based on any such additional requirements and also a decrease based on 'actual number'.
All the flexibility an applicant might need to mitigate any possible conflicts are built in.
 
'M' occupant load calc: 29.2 / 'K' load: 6.4 / 'S': 13.4.
if each of these is rounded up before final tally, total is 51; if rounding up applied to total only, total is 49. this makes a huge difference; and we will have (3) 'phantom occupants' versus (1).
 
steve shaw said:
'M' occupant load calc: 29.2 / 'K' load: 6.4 / 'S': 13.4.
if each of these is rounded up before final tally, total is 51; if rounding up applied to total only, total is 49. this makes a huge difference; and we will have (3) 'phantom occupants' versus (1).
Click to expand...
What are "M," "K," and "S"?
 
If this were my project, I would have occupant loads for each use per Table 1004.1.2 as 29, 6, and 13, respectively, for a total of 48 occupants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JBI
guessing that would be using '.5' as the threshold to round up or down.
if so, are you aware of any way to substantiate this approach?
appreciate your engagement here.
 
steve shaw said:
guessing that would be using '.5' as the threshold to round up or down.
if so, are you aware of any way to substantiate this approach?
appreciate your engagement here.
Click to expand...
As I previously stated, I usually round down regardless of the fractional number. There is nothing to substantiate that approach--or any other approach for that matter--because the IBC does not address fractional numbers in regard to occupant load calculations.
 
[A] 107.2.3 Means of egress.
The construction documents shall show in sufficient detail the location, construction, size and character of all portions of the means of egress including the path of the exit discharge to the public way in compliance with the provisions of this code. In other than occupancies in Groups R-2, R-3, and I-1, the construction documents shall designate the number of occupants to be accommodated on every floor, and in all rooms and spaces.

In your case I would add all the numbers and fractions then come up with the total of 49. As previously stated there is nothing in the code to round up except for plumbing fixtures (2902.1.1)
 
mtlogcabin said:
[A] 107.2.3 Means of egress.
The construction documents shall show in sufficient detail the location, construction, size and character of all portions of the means of egress including the path of the exit discharge to the public way in compliance with the provisions of this code. In other than occupancies in Groups R-2, R-3, and I-1, the construction documents shall designate the number of occupants to be accommodated on every floor, and in all rooms and spaces.

In your case I would add all the numbers and fractions then come up with the total of 49. As previously stated there is nothing in the code to round up except for plumbing fixtures (2902.1.1)
Click to expand...
thanks for your feedback; good support for arguing against incremental rounding up process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JBI
California Plumbing Code 2016
422.1 Fixture Count
"...such numbers shall be rounded to the next whole number..."
 
So I read the prior (old) comments. My question is similar regarding rounding up/down, but not exact, so here it is.

When adding up the occupant load for egress, do you sum and then round up (like for plumbing -the NFPA is so clear!) or round up for each space and then round up again?
I (have) always sum and then round up, but just today I was told I'm supposed to do it the other way, which doesn't make a lot of sense to me but hey, I've been wrong before.
Any thoughts or where I can find clarification on the IBC... if any? Nothing on 107 or 1004 about this that I can see, but perhaps somewhere else? or am I doomed to make that change? rounding up twice puts me over 50 occupants.... and sigh, everything else.
 
I would sum and then round up...but, if I have a space where that extra 1/2 person is going to change egress or fixtures I find a way to lose that 1/2 person.
 
Each space has to have adequate exits for its occupants, so you should round up for each room. I would do a separate calculation with the total areas for each occupancy for building exits and plumbing. That way you wouldn't have a lot of "phantom" occupants fro rounding many 1.5 person offices up to 2 each.
 
Sum and then round up is how I have always done it for the entire floor. Basically when you are doing a room by room calculation it is a net calculation versus a gross calculation. If the entire floor is a "B" occupancy and you calculate the entire floor at 100 sq ft per person you will probably not exceed the sum of all occupiable spaces when adding up all the fractional amounts' and then rounding up to the next whole number.

[BE] FLOOR AREA, GROSS. The floor area within the inside perimeter of the exterior walls of the building under consideration, exclusive of vent shafts and courts, without deduction for corridors, stairways, ramps, closets, the thickness of interior walls, columns or other features. The floor area of a building, or portion thereof, not provided with surrounding exterior walls shall be the usable area under the horizontal projection of the roof or floor above. The gross floor area shall not include shafts with no openings or interior courts.

[BE] FLOOR AREA, NET. The actual occupied area not including unoccupied accessory areas such as corridors, stairways, ramps, toilet rooms, mechanical rooms and closets.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top