o_m_r
REGISTERED
Here's what I do not understand, do plumbers in your area get paid by the lineal foot and fitting. The drain height is offset from the 1st Tee, why not stack another Tee immediately atop of the 1st Tee and come off with just an arm then eliminate the additional overhead vent arm. Not trying to add confusion to the situation buttttttttt.
It's my understanding the venting is proper.
I could be mistaken, but I thought the licensed plumber that did the rebuild of the DWV said you couldn't stack sanitary tees, but I can't find that in the 2012 UPC. I believe that's why they used a combination wye, but I might not be understanding the code correctly. A tee there would've allowed me to fit a stud shoe at that single stud penetration, but ultimately with the leftover bored hole from the first plumbing attempt, that stud still needs either multiple shoes or another solution.
The drainage section of the added sink was actually rebuilt a 3rd time due to a lack of, or negative pitch in that section of the horizontal drainage line. That was a quick fix job and why it resulted in the trap arm being placed quite a bit higher than the other. My sinks are shallow so they won't conflict.
Here's a photo of the first attempt. As I understand it, it was not code because of improper venting, the use of 1-1/2" tubing vs 2" for the drainage line, and the use of "stacking" the tees...
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7bf43abm3wdep5g/IMG_1196.jpg?dl=0