I have a question about panic hardware in an old existing bar. Several months ago the fire marshal and I made a routine inspection of the local bars. He felt uneasy considering they were all connected, built of dry redwood and were built at the turn of the century. In each of the four bars we found the required second exit to have some type of deadbolt, iron bar or latch. Three of the bars are now in compliance, but the fourth is causing problems. The owner installed an approved, but cheap, door with panic hardware, but during an inspection two weeks later, to deal with other violations, we found that he had installed a metal roll-up door in front of the door with panic hardware. He said that this door would be paddle-locked in the open position during business hours (violation of Section 1008.1.3.5). We informed him that it needed to be taken down. He is appealing to the Appeals Board. I feel this was going to be a slam dunk decision, knowing the Board would flatly deny his appeal. The problem is, I just found out he is bring his attorney. I can anticipate the attorney is going to have two possible arguments. There is one that I cannot find an answer for, if there is a good answer. His argument could be that the panic hardware was not required when the building was built. Maybe we could not require the panic hardware, but definitely the deadbolts and bars across the second exit needed to come off.
Do any of you have a take on this?
Dean
Do any of you have a take on this?
Dean