Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
Thanks Fatboy. I used the term "hung up" but maybe that is too extreme. I just wanted to make sure they were somehow accounting for the facilities. They could have easily done so in the code analysis, had they provided one. Since they didn't I had to dig a little deeper. It turns out they were. The permit app listed the building as an S-2, but it was in a park so I assumed (correctly) that this was not to be used as a storage facility, so I wanted to know how many people will be using it and for what reason. All good I think.I didn't say it was not in the scope of the code, I said I wouldn't get hung up on the OL for it specifically.
The one I was referring to is an accessory to the park, there are probably 8-10 City-owned facilities around it, and there is a separate restroom structure in the park.