Your premier resource for building code knowledge.
This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.
Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.
Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.
it really depends on the whole use of the building. If these are accessory uses to the building as a whole (only used by the occupants) exiting through adjacent rooms is not a big deal due to occupant familiarity. If people are coming in off the street, then no, I really don't want to see them exiting through adjacent spaces.
That helps reduce how discoverable the exits need to be. In those situations usually exit signage does not have to be as explicit and you can have some more complicated paths of travel to reach them. Doors still need to open in the right direction though.I'm not positive, but I think these spaces are limited to residents and their guests. But the building is at least 8 stories so there could be quite a few people.
It sounds like no one would be enforcing the limited occupant load for this area. In this case I would reject their request to sign a lower occupant load that the density method.
I could possibly buy that the lounge and terrace are accessory, but fitness would be a harder sell.....Unless they wheel some bikes or treadmills out there at times...
The "discernable path" I usually leave up to the FM if he wants anything special.