• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Rafter bay venting on buildings with parapets

Yikes

SAWHORSE
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
3,977
Location
Southern California
Picture a conventional wood-framed building with parapets and a “flat” (1/2” per foot low slope) roof. The roof assembly is built-up roofing over plywood deck, over 2x or TJIs with batt insulation between, over a fire-rated gyp board membrane. In other words, the indoor ceiling is directly attached to the underside of the rafters.

I see this all the time on apartment buildigns in the southern California area, right? But how come I almost never see ventilation for the individual rafter spaces?

In re-reading IBC 1203.2 in sounds like I should have to individually vent each rafter bay. Yet when you walk these roofs, I typically don’t see ridge vents, nor rows of mushroom vents (one per bay), nor do I see a louver vent on the outside face of the parapet. The IBC commentary does not directly address parapet building situations; the illustrations only show buildings with eaves.

What am I missing here?

I know such ventilation was at the building official’s discretion in the 2001 UBC 1505.3. Was it simply a non-issue on parapet buildings?

Does that continue to be the case in the 2009 IBC?
 
This is exactly why rigid insulation is common on top of the deck. I see no way around the venting requirements. I can remember a discussion with another Architect several years ago and she was saying they wanted to use batt insulation and eliminate the venting requirements by not providing the airspace and I did not agree that it was allowable per code. I don't doubt you see some built that way, but it doesn't make it right.
 
Thanks, Mark. The crazy thing is, we're not just talking about an isolated roof here and there - - I'm talking about the vast majority of roofs. This is not a case of "might makes right", but it does cause me to woder if they know something I don't.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm surprised that it is more of the norm for your area. I don't see that being done much in Washington State, but then again, I don't get onto other architect's job sites too often, so maybe it does happen more than I think.
 
it is becoming more common to have buildings totally conditioned space with no ventilation. i am seeing this pattern more in commercial construction. it's a green thing!
 
Thanks, Examiner, this is exactly what I needed! The literature led me to links at the DOE that prove this particular project is in a Hot + Dry area, minimizing the potential for condensation. (Indeed, tearing off portions of 30 year old unvented roof diaphragm next door reveals no mositure damage.)
 
Back
Top