mark handler
SAWHORSE
Resort sues over 3,000 doors
http://www.upi.com/Business_News/2011/11/02/Resort-sues-architects-over-3000-doors/UPI-23281320274058/?spt=hs∨=bn
Nov. 2, 2011
LAS VEGAS, Nov. 2 (UPI) -- The Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino in Las Vegas is suing the building's safety consultants, alleging door design flaws cost it $20 million, court papers show.
Specifically, the resort says it had to replace 3,000 doors that were too narrow to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, a federal statute, the Las Vegas Sun reported Wednesday.
The disagreement is focused on legal issues. Jean Weil, attorney for fire protection and life safety consulting firm Rolf Jensen & Associates, is arguing that federal statutes prohibit the case from being decided by state courts.
Weil also claims the case would take 60 days at trial, asking the suit be stopped from proceeding as it would not be in the interests of "judicial economy," the newspaper said.
In addition, Weil has attempted to argue the Economic Loss Doctrine is meant to limit liability in acts of negligence or omission.
But Mandalay's attorney, Clark Thiel, said the firm was not immune to a lawsuit and that a trial would take 20 days or less.
Arguments were heard in the Nevada Supreme Court Tuesday, the newspaper said.
http://www.upi.com/Business_News/2011/11/02/Resort-sues-architects-over-3000-doors/UPI-23281320274058/?spt=hs∨=bn
Nov. 2, 2011
LAS VEGAS, Nov. 2 (UPI) -- The Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino in Las Vegas is suing the building's safety consultants, alleging door design flaws cost it $20 million, court papers show.
Specifically, the resort says it had to replace 3,000 doors that were too narrow to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, a federal statute, the Las Vegas Sun reported Wednesday.
The disagreement is focused on legal issues. Jean Weil, attorney for fire protection and life safety consulting firm Rolf Jensen & Associates, is arguing that federal statutes prohibit the case from being decided by state courts.
Weil also claims the case would take 60 days at trial, asking the suit be stopped from proceeding as it would not be in the interests of "judicial economy," the newspaper said.
In addition, Weil has attempted to argue the Economic Loss Doctrine is meant to limit liability in acts of negligence or omission.
But Mandalay's attorney, Clark Thiel, said the firm was not immune to a lawsuit and that a trial would take 20 days or less.
Arguments were heard in the Nevada Supreme Court Tuesday, the newspaper said.