Nope. I'm saying that under the I-codes, an RV does not qualify as a dwelling. The end.
101.2 Scope. The provisions of this code shall apply to
the construction, alteration, relocation, enlargement, replacement,
repair, equipment, use and occupancy, location, maintenance,
removal and demolition of every building or
structure or any appurtenances connected or attached to such
buildings or structures.
Exception: Detached one- and two-family dwellings and
multiple single-family dwellings (townhouses) not more
than three stories above grade plane in height with a separate
means of egress, and their accessory structures not
more than three stories above grade plane in height, shall
comply with the International Residential Code.
So if the RV's don't qualify as a dwelling in the IRC or in the IBC why wouldn't it be enforced in the IBC as non residential?
There are commercial buildings (restaurant, clubhouse, bath house, office) on this property.
At a completely different location I am inspecting today a stairway being built on a hill not connected to any building in a property that has in a golf course, horse farm, club house and a few dwellings that is being inspected under the IBC.
Tell me why the RV park would not be the same.