• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Soundproofing in Structures: A Critical yet Overlooked Element of Building Compliance

jar546

CBO
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
12,723
Location
Not where I really want to be
Sound transmission regulations, as outlined in Sections 1207.1, 1207.2, and 1207.3 of the International Building Code (IBC) and the Florida Building Code (FBC), are often one of the most overlooked yet crucial aspects of building compliance. These regulations are essential for ensuring a comfortable and private living environment in multi-unit buildings, such as apartments, hotels, and condominiums. The focus on soundproofing in these codes reflects the increasing demand for acoustic privacy in residential and public areas.

Section 1207.1: Scope
This section mandates that the sound transmission regulations apply to common interior walls, partitions, and floor/ceiling assemblies between adjacent dwelling and sleeping units or between these units and adjacent public areas such as halls and stairways. This coverage is comprehensive and underscores the importance of sound insulation in a variety of shared living spaces.

Section 1207.2: Airborne Sound
This part of the code specifies the required Sound Transmission Class (STC) for walls, partitions, and floor/ceiling assemblies. An STC of not less than 50 is required, ensuring a significant reduction in the transmission of airborne sound, such as voices or music. The code provides for two methods of establishing the STC rating: testing in accordance with ASTM E90 or an engineering analysis based on a comparison with tested assemblies. Additionally, it requires that any penetrations or openings in these assemblies be adequately sealed or treated to maintain the soundproofing integrity. This clause emphasizes the importance of meticulous construction practices to achieve the desired acoustic performance.

Section 1207.2.1: Masonry
This subsection specifically addresses the sound transmission class of masonry assemblies. It requires that concrete and clay masonry assemblies’ STC ratings be calculated according to TMS 0302 or determined through ASTM E90 testing. This inclusion highlights the unique acoustic properties of masonry materials and the necessity for specific testing standards.

Section 1207.3: Structure-borne Sound
This section deals with impact sounds, such as footsteps, and requires floor/ceiling assemblies to have an Impact Insulation Class (IIC) rating of not less than 50, or an Apparent Impact Insulation Class (AIIC) of not less than 45 if field tested. This requirement ensures that structure-borne sounds are adequately insulated, further contributing to the acoustic comfort of building occupants.

The detailed requirements in these sections of the IBC and FBC are essential for creating peaceful, private living spaces in multi-unit buildings. Overlooking these requirements can lead to significant discomfort for occupants and potential non-compliance with building codes. As a building official, understanding and enforcing these sound transmission standards is key to ensuring the quality and habitability of residential and public buildings.
 
A high percentage of my time over last 40 years dealt with this, but from a functional quality point of view, not code. It's amazing how little most designers and builders know about sound transmission, and the b.s. that gets sold.
 
The STC for garages that are converted to an ADU is missed a lot.

Slightly of topic is windows. We just replaced windows and sliding glass doors. They are dual pane and the outboard panes are 1/8” thick and tempered because we are located in a high fire zone. The inner panes are 3/16” thick. The difference in noise is remarkable. The leaf blowers from the neighbor’s gardeners are barely detectable.

We are on the side of a mountain about two miles from a freeway. A widening project resulted in the removal of a sound wall. We were then hearing more noise from the freeway. The new windows fixed that…. We don’t hear the freeway at all. The 3/16” pane made the difference.
 
Last edited:
I have looked hard through the CA res code and I can't find any requirements for an STC rating or anything like that. Seems like a huge oversight to me...
 
I have looked hard through the CA res code and I can't find any requirements for an STC rating or anything like that. Seems like a huge oversight to me...
It is almost always on the plans. Perhaps it is part of the legislation allowing/forcing the ADUs. Now that the inspectors will be performing the plan check in the field, the STC might be abandoned. How about in your area, have you been requiring an STC 50 on the wall between the ADU and primary residence?
 
If it's using the building code for design, easy to require the STC 50, we see it regularly in apartments. Nothing in my CRC Chapter 3, maybe it was removed? If anybody has a res code reference for STC, I'd love to see it. In CRC there is appendix AK, but unfortunately my city didn't adopt it...
 
If anybody has a res code reference for STC, I'd love to see it
LA County has standard notes and details for garage conversion ADUs and Junior ADUs

https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Residential/Accessory Dwelling Units/Garage Conversion to ADU & JADU Standard Notes and Details.pdf

There you will find the required STC 50 for the garage conversion ADU and no requirement for the JADU. I realize that this is no help outside of LA County but it ca,me from somewhere or LA County probably wouldn't require it.... But I should point out that there is more than a few goofy things in the document... for example, why would a JADU not have a fire rated separation and STC 50?



Screen Shot 2023-12-04 at 11.06.19 AM.png




Screen Shot 2023-12-04 at 11.07.26 AM.png
 
Last edited:
for example, why would a JADU not have a fire rated separation and STC 50?
I think that might be because a JADU is allowed to share facilities such as a laundry room, which is absolutely ridiculous because it essentially becomes no more significant than a room in a house. The only thing I see a JADU is providing is a second address and the ability to claim a "second" unit. Code wise it's not a separate dwelling unit if there is shared access.
 
I think that might be because a JADU is allowed to share facilities such as a laundry room, which is absolutely ridiculous because it essentially becomes no more significant than a room in a house. The only thing I see a JADU is providing is a second address and the ability to claim a "second" unit. Code wise it's not a separate dwelling unit if there is shared access.
I wasn't aware of the shared laundry ... they also can share a bathroom.
 
Back
Top