• Welcome to The Building Code Forum

    Your premier resource for building code knowledge.

    This forum remains free to the public thanks to the generous support of our Sawhorse Members and Corporate Sponsors. Their contributions help keep this community thriving and accessible.

    Want enhanced access to expert discussions and exclusive features? Learn more about the benefits here.

    Ready to upgrade? Log in and upgrade now.

Still a tough road for Americans with disabilities

mark handler

SAWHORSE
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
11,892
Location
So. CA
http://www.nhregister.com/opinion/20140928/editorial-still-a-tough-road-for-americans-with-disabilities

Sometimes, being a big pain is what is takes to draw attention to an issue and get things done. Just ask Seymour resident Joseph Luciano. Luciano, who uses a wheelchair, has left little doubt he is not happy with state, federal and local officials and the snail’s pace cities and towns are taking to conform with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

Luciano is adamant that his wheelchair should not prevent him from shopping, carrying out chores and enjoying what Seymour’s downtown has to offer. He is demanding that access to all public buildings and spaces be made available to persons with disabilities and mobility issues.

We agree. No one should be locked out of everyday activities that are available to most people because of a disability.

The ADA is the equal opportunity law for people with disabilities. It prohibits discrimination and guarantees that people with disabilities have the same opportunities as everyone else to participate in the mainstream of American life.

But like other laws that bar discrimination, it takes the power of the people to ensure that the laws are enforced.

Nearly a quarter of a century after then-President George H.W. Bush signed into law the Americans with Disabilities Act in 1990 (which was later revised and strengthened in 2009), you won’t find any of Connecticut’s 169 towns and cities in total compliance, said Marc Anthony Gallucci, executive director of Center for Disability Rights in West Haven, in an interview with the Register earlier this year.

“Connecticut and its 169 municipalities rank near the bottom of states in complying with the basic mandates of the ADA and the 2008 amendments to it,” Gallucci said at the time. “Less than 12 Connecticut towns and cities have complied with the basic mandates of the law and as a whole, municipalities are not in compliance and have not even started even though they have had 20 years to do so.”

Luciano has been waging a campaign to change that.

With a barrage of letters to local, state and federal officials and multiple stories in newspapers and on TV, the 75-year-old Luciano has taken on officials including agreeing to chair a committee overseeing improvements before resigning. He has lambasted them, filed a complaint with the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities against the town and his apartment complex, dared town officials to “wheel” a mile in his shoes, written op-eds about the difficulty disabled people face, and takes picture after picture and records video to show how difficult life is for disabled people.

And now, he is taking on grants that towns receive to “beautify” downtown areas but do nothing to help with accessibility for people with disabilities who he calls “invisible” to shopkeepers, workers and property owners.

While no one is questioning the good-faith efforts of town and city officials as well as businesses to become ADA compliant — it is challenging and it is costly — Connecticut can’t afford to wait.

Connecticut is aging quickly and the demographics will shift dramatically over the next three decades. By 2050, half the state’s population will be 65 and older. Becoming ADA compliant will also help elderly citizens whose movements are restricted by arthritis and other maladies associated with aging. The year 2050 sounds like a long way off, but it has taken Connecticut nearly 25 years to do practically nothing to become ADA compliant.

The state can’t afford to kick it down to the next administration or heap it on the backs of the next generation.

Some things are getting done. Some agencies and departments have appointed ADA coordinators and most state agencies and departments have conducted ADA self assessments and a few have even done ADA transition plans. But more needs to be done.

We champion Luciano’s mission to ensure people with disabilities and mobility issues are not invisible to the state of Connecticut. Luciano has noted positive steps initiated by Seymour First Selectman Kurt Miller, including the installation of an automatic door opener at Seymour Town Hall.

Miller has said he understands and supports the need to become more ADA compliant but argues the changes can’t happen overnight. Maybe not, but the changes that have been made are not happening fast enough.

We encourage city and town officials to make a greater commitment to become ADA compliant and ensure that people with disabilities are able to enjoy the communities where they live.
 
What other short stick in life comes with the right to sue people that have not harmed them in any way. Are the profoundly ignorant able to sue Sony Corporation because they can't figure out the remote control? Can the legless sue Toyota because they can't operate a a Camry? How about folks that have been on fire? Can they sue Motel Six because there's a mirror in every room? What about crazy people, shouldn't they be allowed to sue Jack Nicholson.

Joseph Luciano is confined to a wheelchair. I think that it is a shame that he and another 1.6 million (not institutionalized) Americans suffer the same fate. How did 0.5% get that way? Dove into the shallow end? Crashed a murdercycle? Went off the marked trail? Can't read the English instructions with that trampoline?

I must be a real a-hole to think such thoughts huh. After all it could have been an illness what done it to him. Well now is it supposed to be okay to sue Dunkin Donuts over a sign that's an inch too large because you got sick?

It's nothing more than a bunch of dogooders taking money from some people and giving it to other people. It makes them feel superior and powerful. It is ridiculous to the point of illegal aliens riding the gravy train.

I recall a code change that made it illegal for the blue symbol in a parking stall to be any larger that 3'. The reason for that was handicapped people felt that a symbol bigger than 3' drew unwanted attention to the fact that the person was disabled.

They have a hang-tag or a special license plate. They are parked next to the front door. The stall is painted blue. There is a sign at the head of the stall. They're in a wheelchair. And they are worried about the the symbol on the pavement under the vehicle. That's because these people are deep thinkers. They thought themselves right into another $4000 payday for a crooked lazy lout.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even Federal facilities are not even close--was at an exhibit on the Blue Ridge Parkway noncompliance started with no above ground signs for parking, curb cut not right, no access to the exhibit cabin, etc etc., The thing is there is not enough money to properly maintain the exhibit--some parts are signed "keep out building unstable" much less make all the accessibility improvements. (Exhibit was put up in 1952). Unfortunately ceasing discrimination against racial groups is relatively cheap--take down the "No Coloreds Allowed" sign; removing barriers to the disabled and maintaining the pathways etc. to the standard in the face of shifting soils etc is expensive.
 
& = & = &



"I must be a real a-hole to think such thoughts huh."
We all have faults and shortcomings **ICE** !.....If anyone thinks that the disabled \ physicallychallenged are in it just for a payday, ...I would invite them to try it for a while............See how

you [ personally ] make out in functioning in your life, from a wheelchair.



& = & = &
 
It is a created class.

Imagine if you will;

"Negro Parking only. All others will be towed. Vehicles not displaying a 'Negro Placard' will be fined."

"Asian Friendly Lane."

"Caucasian Access".

"Women's Ramp."

If you can discriminate by not providing specialized handicapped access, then why are historical considerations made? Or monument stairs?

ADA says it is perfectly fine to deprive someone of their "rights" if certain conditions are met. The literally makes it OK to discriminate, and that is not an arguable point. If DOJ determines the cost of retrofit is too high, you have then been given permission to discriminate. If Lincoln slept in that upstairs bedroom, you don't have to alter the historical stairs to accommodate the wheelchair users.

That is why the entire thing is patently foolish, and insane.

You proponents... give me one single instance where it is legal to discriminate against a race or gender.

And that is the difference. To grant rights to every race, you have to do nothing more than treat them equally. Nothing special needs to be done to accommodate them.

But because of the ridiculous condition of the law that is ADA, it opened the door to oppress people using the legal system.

Accessibility should be a code requirement only. Nothing more.

Brent.
 
"Mass!"

Inaccurate, disability knows no color, religion, sex, etc. It affects "all" of us; dare I say it even you one day. It is an equal opportunity affliction.

It is unfortunate that the response at the Federal Level took so long to happen but it is here now.

We are providing rights to many previously discriminated members of our society,

with a much higher year to year cost then for those with disabilities.

Aren't you concerned about those expenditures?
 
ADAguy said:
"Mass!"Inaccurate, disability knows no color, religion, sex, etc. It affects "all" of us; dare I say it even you one day. It is an equal opportunity affliction.

It is unfortunate that the response at the Federal Level took so long to happen but it is here now.

We are providing rights to many previously discriminated members of our society,

with a much higher year to year cost then for those with disabilities.

Aren't you concerned about those expenditures?
Who tells you this stuff?

From age 65-69 only 43% claim being disabled. even the next 4 years only go to 46%. You have to hit the 75-84 range to get over half claiming some sort of disabled status, at 63%. Only at 85 and older does it get to the 80% range, past the expected life expectancy. So how do you figure it applies to all of us? Your statement is a canard. It is a special, created class, and requires special, specific circumstances.

Whether or not it affects me personally is a selfish diversion from the discussion.

As for the "expenditures", I don't understand the statement. Please clarify and I will retort.

Brent.
 
I think someone needs to go to that newspapers facility and do a comprehensive assessment of its ADA compliance.
 
Back
Top